AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sistrom, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mergo, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sistrom, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mergo, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

A Simple Method for Obtaining Original Data from Published Graphs and Plots

Chris L. Sistrom1 and Patricia J. Mergo

1 Both authors: Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, P. O. Box 100374, Gainesville, FL 32610-0374.



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. —Graph shows scanned plot with scan and plot coordinate systems labeled..TXT file produced by NIH Image will contain numbers in scan coordinate spaces (X and Y pixel values). Spreadsheet operations serve to convert these into plot coordinates (Abs = abscissa, Ord = ordinate, Org = origin, Max = maximum), which are original data values.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. —Reproduction of image file produced by scanning original scatterplot used to test our method. Weight of 227 patients was plotted against age in study of prevertebral soft-tissue thickness on cervical spine radiographs.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. —Scatterplot produced after importing derived data values for weight and age into graphing program (PowerPoint; Microsoft, Redmond, WA). Note that distribution of data points is visually indistinguishable from original material in Figure 2.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. —Graph shows error terms for patient age (in years) derived by conversion of scanned plot (Fig. 2) then compared with original data. Difference between original and derived ages (orig—deriv) is plotted against original age values. Derived age equaled original age for every point.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. —Graph shows error terms for subject weight (in pounds) derived by conversion of scanned plot in Figure 2 then compared with original data. Difference between original and derived weights (orig—deriv) is plotted against original weight values. Mean error (solid line) and limits of agreement (±2 SD, dotted line) are shown.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.