Contribution of Individual Projections Alone and in Combination for Radiographic Detection of Ankle Fractures
Eric A. Brandser1,
Kevin S. Berbaum1,
Donald D. Dorfman1,
Robert J. Braksiek2,
Georges Y. El-Khoury1,
Charles L. Saltzman3,4,
J. L. Marsh3 and
William A. Clark1
1
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins
Dr., Iowa City, IA 52240.
2
College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
52240.
3
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics,
Iowa City, IA 52240.
4
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa Hospitals and
Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52240.

View larger version (110K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1A. 24-year-old man with ankle injury and fracture of medial malleolus.
Anteroposterior radiograph shows oblique fracture (arrows) of medial
malleolus.
|
|

View larger version (102K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1B. 24-year-old man with ankle injury and fracture of medial malleolus.
Mortise view radiograph fails to show fracture as clearly as A. Only
finding is subtle cortical interruption (arrow) at medial
malleolus.
|
|

View larger version (115K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1C. 24-year-old man with ankle injury and fracture of medial malleolus.
Lateral radiograph shows no fracture.
|
|

View larger version (122K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2A. 32-year-old man with trimalleolar fracture. Anteroposterior
radiograph shows lateral malleolus fracture, but fractures of medial and
posterior malleoli are not visible.
|
|

View larger version (138K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2B. 32-year-old man with trimalleolar fracture. Mortise view radiograph
shows lateral malleolus fracture and also shows medial malleolus fracture
(arrow) not seen in A but does not show posterior malleolus
fracture.
|
|

View larger version (103K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2C. 32-year-old man with trimalleolar fracture. Lateral radiograph shows
fractures of posterior and lateral malleoli, but medial malleolus fracture is
not visible.
|
|

View larger version (74K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Models for combining single radiographic view interpretations into
two- and three-view combinations. Top row is for anteroposterior (AP) and
lateral combination, middle row is for mortise and lateral combination, and
bottom row is for three-view combination. Matrices show numeric value for a
given subject on basis of confidence rating assigned by a rater on individual
views. See Appendix for more detail.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.