AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kinkel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hylton, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kinkel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hylton, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Dynamic High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging of Suspicious Breast Lesions

Diagnostic Criteria and Interobserver Variability

Karen Kinkel1,2, Thomas H. Helbich1,3, Laura J. Esserman4, John Barclay5, Ellen H. Schwerin1, Edward A. Sickles1 and Nola M. Hylton1

1 Division of Radiology, Magnetic Resonance Science Center, University of California, Box 1290, 1 Irving St., Rm. AC-109, San Francisco, CA 94143-1290.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve, Hopital Cantonal, 24, rue Micheli-du-Crest, CH-1211 Geneve 14, Switzerland.
3 Present address: Department of Radiology, University of Vienna AKH, Waehringer Guertel, Vienna 1090, Austria.
4 Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.
5 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.



View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. —67-year-old woman with suspicious density on mammography and normal findings on sonography. Unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images reveal small focal mass corresponding to invasive cancer at histopathology. First contrast-enhanced image (B) at 2 min 30 sec shows irregular borders at posterior portion of mass (arrow, B). On second enhanced image (C), slight washout enhancement pattern (arrow, C) can be identified at 7 min 30 sec in central portion of mass.

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. —67-year-old woman with suspicious density on mammography and normal findings on sonography. Unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images reveal small focal mass corresponding to invasive cancer at histopathology. First contrast-enhanced image (B) at 2 min 30 sec shows irregular borders at posterior portion of mass (arrow, B). On second enhanced image (C), slight washout enhancement pattern (arrow, C) can be identified at 7 min 30 sec in central portion of mass.

 


View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1C. —67-year-old woman with suspicious density on mammography and normal findings on sonography. Unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images reveal small focal mass corresponding to invasive cancer at histopathology. First contrast-enhanced image (B) at 2 min 30 sec shows irregular borders at posterior portion of mass (arrow, B). On second enhanced image (C), slight washout enhancement pattern (arrow, C) can be identified at 7 min 30 sec in central portion of mass.

 


View larger version (82K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A. —61-year-old woman with 1-cm spiculated mass on mammography and indeterminate results at fine-needle aspiration. Focal mass with spiculated margins is less visible on unenhanced (A) than on first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images. Strong degree of enhancement and spiculated margins are highly suspicious of malignancy (B). At 7 min 30 sec (C), heterogeneous washout pattern is identified in mass (arrow, C). Histopathology results showed 1.3-cm invasive cancer with surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ.

 


View larger version (94K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B. —61-year-old woman with 1-cm spiculated mass on mammography and indeterminate results at fine-needle aspiration. Focal mass with spiculated margins is less visible on unenhanced (A) than on first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images. Strong degree of enhancement and spiculated margins are highly suspicious of malignancy (B). At 7 min 30 sec (C), heterogeneous washout pattern is identified in mass (arrow, C). Histopathology results showed 1.3-cm invasive cancer with surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ.

 


View larger version (107K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2C. —61-year-old woman with 1-cm spiculated mass on mammography and indeterminate results at fine-needle aspiration. Focal mass with spiculated margins is less visible on unenhanced (A) than on first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images. Strong degree of enhancement and spiculated margins are highly suspicious of malignancy (B). At 7 min 30 sec (C), heterogeneous washout pattern is identified in mass (arrow, C). Histopathology results showed 1.3-cm invasive cancer with surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ.

 


View larger version (88K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. —65-year-old woman with spiculated mass on mammography and general contraindication for surgery. Unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images reveal small spiculated mass. Although second contrast-enhanced image (C) at 7 min 30 sec shows slightly progressive enhancement pattern (arrow, C), final histopathology revealed invasive ductal cancer.

 


View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. —65-year-old woman with spiculated mass on mammography and general contraindication for surgery. Unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images reveal small spiculated mass. Although second contrast-enhanced image (C) at 7 min 30 sec shows slightly progressive enhancement pattern (arrow, C), final histopathology revealed invasive ductal cancer.

 


View larger version (91K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C. —65-year-old woman with spiculated mass on mammography and general contraindication for surgery. Unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images reveal small spiculated mass. Although second contrast-enhanced image (C) at 7 min 30 sec shows slightly progressive enhancement pattern (arrow, C), final histopathology revealed invasive ductal cancer.

 


View larger version (103K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. —44-year-old woman with partially obscured mammographic mass and suspicious shadowing on sonography. Lobulated mass is seen on unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images. First contrast-enhanced image (B) at 2 min 30 sec reveals irregular anterior margins (arrow, B) and nonenhancing septation. Second contrast-enhanced image (C) at 7 min 30 shows strong progressive enhancement pattern (arrow, C). Histopathology confirmed fibroadenoma.

 


View larger version (98K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. —44-year-old woman with partially obscured mammographic mass and suspicious shadowing on sonography. Lobulated mass is seen on unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images. First contrast-enhanced image (B) at 2 min 30 sec reveals irregular anterior margins (arrow, B) and nonenhancing septation. Second contrast-enhanced image (C) at 7 min 30 shows strong progressive enhancement pattern (arrow, C). Histopathology confirmed fibroadenoma.

 


View larger version (101K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4C. —44-year-old woman with partially obscured mammographic mass and suspicious shadowing on sonography. Lobulated mass is seen on unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images. First contrast-enhanced image (B) at 2 min 30 sec reveals irregular anterior margins (arrow, B) and nonenhancing septation. Second contrast-enhanced image (C) at 7 min 30 shows strong progressive enhancement pattern (arrow, C). Histopathology confirmed fibroadenoma.

 


View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5A. —45-year-old woman with palpable 7-mm noncalcified mass on mammography. Unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images show oval mass of changing size. First contrast-enhanced image (B) at 2 min 30 sec shows strongly enhancing focal mass with smooth borders (arrow, B). Slight decrease in size and signal intensity on second contrast-enhanced image (C) at 7 min 30 sec indicate global washout enhancement pattern (arrow, C). Histopathology revealed benign granular cell tumor.

 


View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5B. —45-year-old woman with palpable 7-mm noncalcified mass on mammography. Unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images show oval mass of changing size. First contrast-enhanced image (B) at 2 min 30 sec shows strongly enhancing focal mass with smooth borders (arrow, B). Slight decrease in size and signal intensity on second contrast-enhanced image (C) at 7 min 30 sec indicate global washout enhancement pattern (arrows, C). Histopathology revealed benign granular cell tumor.

 


View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5C. —45-year-old woman with palpable 7-mm noncalcified mass on mammography. Unenhanced (A) and first (B) and second (C) contrast-enhanced high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast gradient-recalled echo images show oval mass of changing size. First contrast-enhanced image (B) at 2 min 30 sec shows strongly enhancing focal mass with smooth borders (arrow, B). Slight decrease in size and signal intensity on second contrast-enhanced image (C) at 7 min 30 sec indicate global washout enhancement pattern (arrows, C). Histopathology revealed benign granular cell tumor.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. —Tree diagram shows diagnostic algorithm for breast lesion characterization using washout enhancement pattern and margin characteristics. Lesion showing washout is malignant unless it has smooth margins. Lesion without washout is benign unless it has spiculated margins. Number of true-positive (TP), true-negative (TN), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) results are indicated on right side of figure for each branch of tree.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.