AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Metreweli, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Metreweli, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Comparison of Dynamic Helical CT and Dynamic MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Cervical Carcinoma

Wei Tse Yang1, Wynnie Wai Man Lam1, Mei Yung Yu2, Tak Hong Cheung3 and Constantine Metreweli1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
2 Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.



View larger version (126K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. —31-year-old woman with right hypogastric lymph node metastasis found at pathology. Unenhanced axial CT scan of pelvis shows round mildly hypodense nodule (arrow) in right hypogastric region.

 


View larger version (126K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. —31-year-old woman with right hypogastric lymph node metastasis found at pathology. Arterial phase axial CT scan obtained at same level as A shows heterogeneous peripheral enhancement of node (solid arrow) and external iliac artery (open arrow) opacification.

 


View larger version (119K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1C. —31-year-old woman with right hypogastric lymph node metastasis found at pathology. Venous phase CT scan obtained at same level as B shows peripheral rim enhancement of node (long black arrow). Prominence of intranodal necrosis exceeds that seen in A and B. Note iliac vein (short black arrow) enhancement and ureteric (curved white arrow) opacification.

 


View larger version (118K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1D. —31-year-old woman with right hypogastric lymph node metastasis found at pathology. Axial short-tau inversion-recovery fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR image obtained at same level as C shows right hypogastric node (solid arrow) with hyperintense area (open arrow) that was hypointense on T1-weighted image (not shown), representing intranodal necrosis.

 


View larger version (146K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A. —39-year-old woman with left external iliac nodal metastasis at pathology. Unenhanced axial T1-weighted MR image shows ovoid hypointense nodule (arrow) in left external iliac region.

 


View larger version (171K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B. —39-year-old woman with left external iliac nodal metastasis at pathology. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR image obtained at same level as A shows heterogeneous peripheral enhancement (arrows) with nonenhancing central necrotic region (asterisk).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. —Receiving operating characteristic curves of maximal axial diameter obtained with CT (dotted line) and with MR imaging (solid line) show area under curve to be 85.7% and 83.5%, respectively.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. —Receiving operating characteristic curves of minimal axial diameter obtained with CT (dotted line) and with MR imaging (solid line) show area under curve to be 81.7% and 86.8%, respectively.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. —Scatterplot of unenhanced signal intensity of pelvic nodes measured in patients with benign and in those with malignant pelvic lymph nodes at histology. Although mean value of unenhanced signal intensity for malignant nodes (704 ± 224) is lower than that for benign nodes (833 ± 252), significant overlap exists.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. —Bar chart displays distribution of peak rate of enhancement on MR imaging for nodes in patients with histologic benign (white bars) and malignant (black bars) disease. Malignant nodes showed earlier peak rate of enhancement compared with benign nodes, but difference was not significant (p > 0.5).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.