AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Callister, T.
Right arrow Articles by Raggi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Callister, T.
Right arrow Articles by Raggi, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Sensitivity of Two Electron Beam Tomography Protocols for the Detection and Quantification of Coronary Artery Calcium

Tracy Callister1, Warren Janowitz2 and Paolo Raggi3

1 EBT Research Foundation, 64 Valleybrook Dr., Hendersonville, TN 37075.
2 Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, 8900 N. Kendall Dr., Miami, FL 33176.
3 Cardiology Section, SL 48, Tulane University School of Medicine, 14 Tulane Ave., New Orleans, LA 70112.



View larger version (100K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. 62-year-old woman with calcified coronary artery plaques. Axial electron beam tomography image obtained with 3-mm collimation protocol shows two distinct calcified areas at level of proximal (arrowhead) and mid (arrow) portions of the left anterior descending coronary artery.

 


View larger version (72K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. 62-year-old woman with calcified coronary artery plaques. Axial electron beam tomography image with 6-mm collimation protocol obtained in same patient as in A. With this protocol, the proximal lesion appears much smaller, and the plaque in middle portion of vessel is undetectable. A greater degree of partial volume averaging causes smoothing and softening of image.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.