Factors Influencing Visualization of Vertebral Metastases on MR Imaging Versus Bone Scintigraphy
Toshiaki Taoka1,
Nina A. Mayr,
Han J. Lee,
William T. C. Yuh,
Teresa M. Simonson,
Karim Rezai and
Kevin S. Berbaum
1
All authors: Department of Radiology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center,
University of Iowa College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA
52242.
Fig. 1.Graph of correlation of positive bone scan with lesion
location and size. Z-axis indicates the percentage of positive
findings on bone scintigraphy, which were noted more frequently in large
lesions than in small lesions. Positive bone scintigraphy findings were also
frequently associated with MR evidence of cortical involvement, particularly
with transcortical lesions.
Fig. 2A.75-year-old man with biopsy-proven lung carcinoma who
complained of right flank pain. Parasagittal T1-weighted MR image of spine
shows large lesion without cortical involvement at T12 and diffuse lesion with
cortical extension at L1.
Fig. 2B.75-year-old man with biopsy-proven lung carcinoma who
complained of right flank pain. Planar bone scan shows moderate uptake at L1
but no recognizable uptake at T12.
Fig. 3A.56-year-old man who complained of back pain during treatment
for biopsy-proven ileal carcinoid tumor. Sagittal T1-weighted MR image of
lumbar spine shows large transcortical lesion at anteroinferior L3
vertebra.
Fig. 3B.56-year-old man who complained of back pain during treatment
for biopsy-proven ileal carcinoid tumor. Axial T1-weighted MR image through
inferior L3 shows lesion (arrows) extending through richly innervated
periosteum of cortex. Note loss of adjacent fat plane compared with that of
opposite side.
Fig. 3C.56-year-old man who complained of back pain during treatment
for biopsy-proven ileal carcinoid tumor. Planar bone scan shows positive
correlation with B, reflecting large area of cortical involvement.
Fig. 4.Graph of direct relationship between cortical involvement and
lesion size. Incidence of transcortical and subcortical involvement was much
higher in large lesions than in small lesions and in most small intramedullary
lesions.
Fig. 5A.43-year-old woman with breast carcinoma who complained of
back pain. Parasagittal T1-weighted MR image of spine shows large lesion at L1
vertebral body with cortical contact.
Fig. 5B.43-year-old woman with breast carcinoma who complained of
back pain. Parasagittal T1-weighted MR image shows multiple small lesions at
L3, L4, and S1 with cortical contact. L4 has two intramedullary lesions.
Fig. 5C.43-year-old woman with breast carcinoma who complained of
back pain. Axial T1-weighted MR image through inferior L4 shows small lesion
with cortical contact but no definite cortical break.
Fig. 6A.67-year-old woman with lung carcinoma who complained of newly
developed lower back pain. Parasagittal T1-weighted MR image of spine shows
large lesion involving right pedicle and lamina of T12 (arrow).
Fig. 6B.67-year-old woman with lung carcinoma who complained of newly
developed lower back pain. Axial T1-weighted MR image through T12 shows
definite cortical destruction (asterisk).
Fig. 6C.67-year-old woman with lung carcinoma who complained of newly
developed lower back pain. Planar bone scan shows no increased uptake on T12
despite MR imaging findings of large lesion with cortical destruction.