AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lanciego, C.
Right arrow Articles by García-García, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lanciego, C.
Right arrow Articles by García-García, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Stenting as First Option for Endovascular Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome

C. Lanciego1, J. L. Chacón2, A. Julián2, J. Andrade2, L. López2, B. Martinez2, M. Cruz2 and L. García-García1

1 Unidad de Radiología Vascular-Intervencionista, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Avda. de Barber s/n, 45004 Toledo, Spain.
2 Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, 45004 Toledo, Spain.



View larger version (132K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. 68-year-old man with small cell carcinoma and occlusion of both brachiocephalic veins that resulted in severe superior vena cava syndrome. Patient underwent implantation of two Wallstents (Boston Scientific, Schneider Europe, Bulach, Switzerland), one on each side, in tandem technique. Superior venacavagram shows obstruction of both innominate venous trunks and development of collateral network from neck veins.

 


View larger version (129K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. 68-year-old man with small cell carcinoma and occlusion of both brachiocephalic veins that resulted in severe superior vena cava syndrome. Patient underwent implantation of two Wallstents (Boston Scientific, Schneider Europe, Bulach, Switzerland), one on each side, in tandem technique. Final superior venacavagram obtained after bilateral stent placement shows disappearance of collateral venous network.

 


View larger version (157K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A. 72-year-old man with non—small cell lung carcinoma and progressive superior vena cava syndrome due to severe stenosis. Superior venacavagram before endovascular treatment shows severe stenosis of vena cava and confluence of right innominate vein. Note collateral venous network from thoracic, neck, and azygos veins.

 


View larger version (113K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B. 72-year-old man with non—small cell lung carcinoma and progressive superior vena cava syndrome due to severe stenosis. Venacavagram after placement of Wallstent (Boston Scientific, Schneider Europe, Bulach, Switzerland) vascular endoprosthesis (16 mm diameter x 6 cm length) in right innominate vein and superior vena cava shows disappearance of venous network.

 


View larger version (124K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2C. 72-year-old man with non—small cell lung carcinoma and progressive superior vena cava syndrome due to severe stenosis. Clinical appearance of patient with superior vena cava syndrome before stenting. Note swelling of face, neck, and upper thorax.

 


View larger version (142K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2D. 72-year-old man with non—small cell lung carcinoma and progressive superior vena cava syndrome due to severe stenosis. Same patient 48 hr after stenting.

 


View larger version (114K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. 67-year-old man with occlusion of superior vena cava due to non—small cell lung carcinoma in whom (as is routine in all cases) we used specialized software to measure both degree and extent of stenosis. This knowledge helps in making correct choice of prosthesis. Superior venacavagram shows stenosis of vena cava and prominent collateral venous network.

 


View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. 67-year-old man with occlusion of superior vena cava due to non—small cell lung carcinoma in whom (as is routine in all cases) we used specialized software to measure both degree and extent of stenosis. This knowledge helps in making correct choice of prosthesis. Venacavagram after placement of Wallstent (Boston Scientific, Schneider Europe, Bulach, Switzerland) shows vessel reopening and resolution of vena cava stenosis.

 


View larger version (115K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C. 67-year-old man with occlusion of superior vena cava due to non—small cell lung carcinoma in whom (as is routine in all cases) we used specialized software to measure both degree and extent of stenosis. This knowledge helps in making correct choice of prosthesis. Marks and diagrams show measurement of stenosis in A (length, diameter, and stenosed area) using dedicated software.

 


View larger version (130K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3D. 67-year-old man with occlusion of superior vena cava due to non—small cell lung carcinoma in whom (as is routine in all cases) we used specialized software to measure both degree and extent of stenosis. This knowledge helps in making correct choice of prosthesis. New marks and diagrams show reassessment of stenosed vessel in B to determine grade of stenosis reduction.

 


View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. Mode of deployment for bilateral stent placement. 64-year-old male patient has superior vena cava obstruction caused by mesothelioma. Fluoroscopic images show sequence of procedure for placement of prosthesis at X. Maneuver is performed simultaneously by two radiologists (one on each side of patient). Both prostheses are lengthened at same time and placed fully extended with help of balloon catheter.

 


View larger version (119K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. Mode of deployment for bilateral stent placement. 64-year-old male patient has superior vena cava obstruction caused by mesothelioma. Fluoroscopic images show sequence of procedure for placement of prosthesis at X. Maneuver is performed simultaneously by two radiologists (one on each side of patient). Both prostheses are lengthened at same time and placed fully extended with help of balloon catheter.

 


View larger version (128K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4C. Mode of deployment for bilateral stent placement. 64-year-old male patient has superior vena cava obstruction caused by mesothelioma. Fluoroscopic images show sequence of procedure for placement of prosthesis at X. Maneuver is performed simultaneously by two radiologists (one on each side of patient). Both prostheses are lengthened at same time and placed fully extended with help of balloon catheter.

 


View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4D. Mode of deployment for bilateral stent placement. 64-year-old male patient has superior vena cava obstruction caused by mesothelioma. Fluoroscopic images show sequence of procedure for placement of prosthesis at X. Maneuver is performed simultaneously by two radiologists (one on each side of patient). Both prostheses are lengthened at same time and placed fully extended with help of balloon catheter.

 


View larger version (158K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Only one prosthesis on one side (right side in this patient) is needed to treat 62-year-old man with superior vena cava syndrome caused by small cell carcinoma. Note that clearly permeable mesh of stent facilitates left venous return. Unilateral rather than bilateral stent placement is our preferred technique.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.