AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zähringer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lackner, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zähringer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lackner, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Detection of Porcine Bone Lesions and Fissures

Comparing Digital Selenium, Digital Luminescence, and Analog Film-Screen Radiography

Markus Zähringer1, Barbara Krug1, Karl-F. Kamm2, Gernot Wassmer3, Martin Hellmich3, Guido Winnekendonk1, Jonas Andermahr4, Axel Goßmann1 and Klaus J. Lackner1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Cologne Medical School, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50924 Cologne, Germany.
2 Philips Medical Systems, Röntgenstr. 24, 22335 Hamburg, Germany.
3 Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne Medical School, 50924 Cologne, Germany.
4 Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Cologne Medical School, 50924 Cologne, Germany.



View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. Images of porcine ribs with subtle fissures and bone lesions. Analog film-screen images shown are from mammography film (A), 200-speed film-screen (B), and 400-speed film-screen (C).

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. Images of porcine ribs with subtle fissures and bone lesions. Analog film-screen images shown are from mammography film (A), 200-speed film-screen (B), and 400-speed film-screen (C).

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1C. Images of porcine ribs with subtle fissures and bone lesions. Analog film-screen images shown are from mammography film (A), 200-speed film-screen (B), and 400-speed film-screen (C).

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1D. Images of porcine ribs with subtle fissures and bone lesions. Digital images shown are from digital selenium radiography (D) and digital luminescence radiography (E) at dose values corresponding to 200-speed film-screen systems.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1E. Images of porcine ribs with subtle fissures and bone lesions. Digital images shown are from digital selenium radiography (D) and digital luminescence radiography (E) at dose values corresponding to 200-speed film-screen systems.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1F. Images of porcine ribs with subtle fissures and bone lesions. Digital images shown are from digital selenium radiography (F) and digital luminescence radiography (G) at dose values corresponding to 400-speed film-screen systems.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1G. Images of porcine ribs with subtle fissures and bone lesions. Digital images shown are from digital selenium radiography (F) and digital luminescence radiography (G) at dose values corresponding to 400-speed film-screen systems.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A. Osteolyses on porcine femurs: receiver operating characteristic curves for seven imaging methods per rater. 200 = 200-speed film-screen radiography, 400 = 400-speed film-screen radiography, Mammo = mammography, Selen = digital selenium radiography, DLR = digital luminescence radiography. Graphs show trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity for reviewers 1 (A), 2 (B), 3 (C), and 4 (D) for seven imaging methods.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B. Osteolyses on porcine femurs: receiver operating characteristic curves for seven imaging methods per rater. 200 = 200-speed film-screen radiography, 400 = 400-speed film-screen radiography, Mammo = mammography, Selen = digital selenium radiography, DLR = digital luminescence radiography. Graphs show trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity for reviewers 1 (A), 2 (B), 3 (C), and 4 (D) for seven imaging methods.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2C. Osteolyses on porcine femurs: receiver operating characteristic curves for seven imaging methods per rater. 200 = 200-speed film-screen radiography, 400 = 400-speed film-screen radiography, Mammo = mammography, Selen = digital selenium radiography, DLR = digital luminescence radiography. Graphs show trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity for reviewers 1 (A), 2 (B), 3 (C), and 4 (D) for seven imaging methods.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2D. Osteolyses on porcine femurs: receiver operating characteristic curves for seven imaging methods per rater. 200 = 200-speed film-screen radiography, 400 = 400-speed film-screen radiography, Mammo = mammography, Selen = digital selenium radiography, DLR = digital luminescence radiography. Graphs show trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity for reviewers 1 (A), 2 (B), 3 (C), and 4 (D) for seven imaging methods.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.