AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, S. S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Metreweli, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho, S. S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Metreweli, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Blood Flow Volume Quantification of Cerebral Ischemia

Comparison of Three Noninvasive Imaging Techniques of Carotid and Vertebral Arteries

Stella Sin Yee Ho1, Yu Leung Chan1, David Ka Wai Yeung1 and Constantine Metreweli1

1 All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.



View larger version (127K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. Blood flow volume measurement of internal carotid artery by different techniques in 58-year-old man who recently had minor stroke. Spectral Doppler imaging quantification shows proximal segment of internal carotid artery (ICA). Angle-corrected mean velocity (48.9 cm/sec) and perpendicular vessel diameter (0.43 cm) at site of interrogation were used in calculation of blood flow volume. Obtained value was 426.1 mL/min.

 


View larger version (109K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. Blood flow volume measurement of internal carotid artery by different techniques in 58-year-old man who recently had minor stroke. Color velocity imaging quantification shows blood flow volume measurement of same segment (A). Flow volume of 198 mL/min was computed in this vessel on colour M-mode. Note discrepancy of values between two techniques.

 


View larger version (120K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1C. Blood flow volume measurement of internal carotid artery by different techniques in 58-year-old man who recently had minor stroke. MR phase-contrast flow quantification on high-resolution nontriggered two-dimensional phase-contrast axial images (TR/TE, 30/9.7; flip angle, 150°) shows same internal carotid artery (A) with flow data display. Image was at plane perpendicular to left internal carotid artery on MR angiography. Left upper image is magnitude image on which region of interest (ROI) at left internal carotid artery was drawn. Right upper image is phase image on which ROI drawn at left internal carotid artery on magnitude image was transposed. Respective flow information (3.49 mL/sec) was displayed on lower table corresponding to 209.4 mL/min.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Line graph shows variation of flow volume by different techniques in phantom simulation study. [UNK] = ideal, x = color velocity imaging quantification, {circ} = spectral Doppler imaging quantification, {blacktriangleup} = MR phase-contrast flow quantification.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. Plots show differences between blood flow volume measurements in internal carotid arteries in paired techniques against their mean. Plot shows color velocity imaging quantification versus MR phase-contrast flow quantification.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. Plots show differences between blood flow volume measurements in internal carotid arteries in paired techniques against their mean. Plot shows MR phase-contrast flow quantification versus spectral Doppler imaging quantification.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C. Plots show differences between blood flow volume measurements in internal carotid arteries in paired techniques against their mean. Plot shows color velocity imaging quantification versus spectral Doppler imaging quantification.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. Plots of differences between blood flow volume measurements in vertebral arteries in paired techniques against their mean. Plot shows color velocity imaging quantification versus MR phase-contrast flow quantification.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. Plots of differences between blood flow volume measurements in vertebral arteries in paired techniques against their mean. Plot shows MR phase-contrast flow quantification versus spectral Doppler imaging quantification.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4C. Plots of differences between blood flow volume measurements in vertebral arteries in paired techniques against their mean. Plot shows color velocity imaging quantification versus spectral Doppler imaging quantification.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.