Usefulness of FDG PET for Assessment of Early Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Song-Mee Cho1,
Hyun Kwon Ha2,
Jae Young Byun1,
Jae Mun Lee1,
Chan Joo Kim3,
Sung Eun Nam-Koong3 and
Joon Mo Lee3
1 Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of
Korea, Seocho-Ku, Seoul, South Korea.
2 Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical
Center, 388-1 Poongnap-Dong Songpa-Ku, Seoul, South Korea.
3 Department of Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of
Korea, 505 Banpo-Dong, Seocho-Ku, Seoul, South Korea.

View larger version (125K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1A. 41-year-old woman with recurrent ovarian cancer in pelvis.
Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at level of hip joint shows two nodular
enhancing lesions (arrows) in pelvis, one just above vaginal stump
and second in left pelvic peritoneum. Both lesions were missed on CT.
|
|

View larger version (131K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1B. 41-year-old woman with recurrent ovarian cancer in pelvis.
Regional axial FDG positron emission tomogram shows two nodular lesions
(arrows) in pelvis.
|
|

View larger version (148K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2A. 39-year-old woman with recurrent ovarian cancer in
peritoneum. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at level of liver shows smooth
linear contrast enhancement (arrows) along hepatic surface.
|
|

View larger version (133K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2B. 39-year-old woman with recurrent ovarian cancer in
peritoneum. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at level of mid abdomen shows
subtle nodular linear contrast enhancement (arrows) at peritoneum
along right paracolic gutter.
|
|

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2C. 39-year-old woman with recurrent ovarian cancer in
peritoneum. Whole-body coronal image of FDG positron emission tomograsm shows
strong FDG uptake at hepatic surface (arrows) and peritoneum
(arrowheads) along both paracolic gutters. Urine in bladder (B) also
shows FDG uptake.
|
|

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Graph shows detection rates for specific tumor sizes on FDG
positron emission tomography (dotted line) and CT (solid
line). To calculate detection rates for specific tumor size, we included
all nodules in denominator that were larger than tumor size. Tumor detection
rates on CT for tumors of diameters 0.3-, 0.4-, 0.5-, 0.6-, and 0.7- cm
significantly exceeded those for FDG PET (p < 0.05).
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.