AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Preoperative Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Ferumoxides-Enhanced Versus Mangafodipir Trisodium—Enhanced MR Imaging

Seung Kwon Kim1, Seung Hoon Kim, Won Jae Lee, Hana Kim, Jung Wook Seo, Dongil Choi, Hyo K. Lim, Soon Jin Lee and Jae Hoon Lim

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50, Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul 135-710, Korea.



View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Graph shows composite receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for pooled data reviewed by three observers. Curves indicate relative accuracy with which hepatocellular carcinomas were detected on ferumoxides-enhanced ({diamondsuit}) MR images of all five sequences (area under ROC curve [Az] = 0.971 ± 0.013) and mangafodipir trisodium—enhanced ({circ}) MR images of all four sequences (Az = 0.950 ± 0.016). Difference in mean areas under curves was significant (p < 0.05).

 


View larger version (162K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A. 36-year-old woman with 0.7-and 0.6-cm hepatocellular carcinomas in liver segment VII. Ferumoxides-enhanced proton density—weighted fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (TR/TE, 6000/17) (A) and T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (130/8.2; flip angle, 30°) (B) MR images show two small discrete high-signal-intensity lesions (arrows).

 


View larger version (163K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B. 36-year-old woman with 0.7-and 0.6-cm hepatocellular carcinomas in liver segment VII. Ferumoxides-enhanced proton density—weighted fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (TR/TE, 6000/17) (A) and T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (130/8.2; flip angle, 30°) (B) MR images show two small discrete high-signal-intensity lesions (arrows).

 


View larger version (144K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2C. 36-year-old woman with 0.7-and 0.6-cm hepatocellular carcinomas in liver segment VII. Corresponding lesions are not found on unenhanced in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo (C) and mangafodipir trisodium—enhanced inphase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo (200/4.2; flip angle, 90°) (D) MR images.

 


View larger version (154K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2D. 36-year-old woman with 0.7-and 0.6-cm hepatocellular carcinomas in liver segment VII. Corresponding lesions are not found on unenhanced in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo (C) and mangafodipir trisodium—enhanced inphase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo (200/4.2; flip angle, 90°) (D) MR images.

 


View larger version (165K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. 37-year-old woman with 3-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V. Ferumoxides-enhanced proton density—weighted fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (TR/TE, 5714/18) (A) and T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (130/8.4; flip angle, 30°) (B) MR images show discrete high-signal-intensity lesion (arrows).

 


View larger version (178K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. 37-year-old woman with 3-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V. Ferumoxides-enhanced proton density—weighted fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (TR/TE, 5714/18) (A) and T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (130/8.4; flip angle, 30°) (B) MR images show discrete high-signal-intensity lesion (arrows).

 


View larger version (158K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C. 37-year-old woman with 3-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V. Unenhanced in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR image (200/4.2; flip angle, 90°) shows discrete high-signal-intensity lesion (arrows).

 


View larger version (150K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3D. 37-year-old woman with 3-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V. Mangafodipir trisodium—enhanced in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR image shows homogeneous enhancement of lesion (arrows).

 


View larger version (146K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. 44-year-old man with 2.5-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V (not shown). Mangafodipir trisodium—enhanced in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR image (TR/TE, 200/4.2; flip angle, 90°) shows small enhancing lesion (arrows) in subcapsular portion of segment VI. Lesion was interpreted as hepatocellular carcinoma by two observers.

 


View larger version (141K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. 44-year-old man with 2.5-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V (not shown). Corresponding lesion is not seen on unenhanced in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo (B), ferumoxides-enhanced proton density—weighted fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (5714/18) (C), or T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (130/8.4; flip angle, 30°) (D) MR images.

 


View larger version (136K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4C. 44-year-old man with 2.5-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V (not shown). Corresponding lesion is not seen on unenhanced in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo (B), ferumoxides-enhanced proton density—weighted fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (5714/18) (C), or T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (130/8.4; flip angle, 30°) (D) MR images.

 


View larger version (160K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4D. 44-year-old man with 2.5-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V (not shown). Corresponding lesion is not seen on unenhanced in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo (B), ferumoxides-enhanced proton density—weighted fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (5714/18) (C), or T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (130/8.4; flip angle, 30°) (D) MR images.

 


View larger version (133K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5A. 46-year-old man with 1.3-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V. Ferumoxides-enhanced proton density—weighted fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (TR/TE, 7500/17) (A) and T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (130/8.2; flip angle, 30°) (B) MR images show discrete high-signal-intensity lesion (arrows).

 


View larger version (132K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5B. 46-year-old man with 1.3-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V. Ferumoxides-enhanced proton density—weighted fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (TR/TE, 7500/17) (A) and T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (130/8.2; flip angle, 30°) (B) MR images show discrete high-signal-intensity lesion (arrows).

 


View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5C. 46-year-old man with 1.3-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V. Unenhanced in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR image (200/4.2; flip angle, 90°) shows ill-defined lesion (arrows) that is isointense to surrounding liver parenchyma.

 


View larger version (115K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5D. 46-year-old man with 1.3-cm hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment V. Mangafodipir trisodium—enhanced in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR image shows subtle enhancement of lesion (arrows).

 


View larger version (156K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6A. 60-year-old man with 2.2-cm well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VIII. Ferumoxides-enhanced proton density—weighted fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (TR/TE, 5000/18) (A) and T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (130/8.4; flip angle, 30°) (B) MR images show lesion (arrows) that is subtly isointense to surrounding liver parenchyma.

 


View larger version (145K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6B. 60-year-old man with 2.2-cm well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VIII. Ferumoxides-enhanced proton density—weighted fat-suppressed respiratory-triggered fast spin-echo (TR/TE, 5000/18) (A) and T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state (130/8.4; flip angle, 30°) (B) MR images show lesion (arrows) that is subtly isointense to surrounding liver parenchyma.

 


View larger version (160K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6C. 60-year-old man with 2.2-cm well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VIII. Unenhanced out-of-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR image (200/2.2; flip angle, 90°) shows discrete high-signal-intensity lesion (arrows).

 


View larger version (163K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6D. 60-year-old man with 2.2-cm well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VIII. Mangafodipir trisodium—enhanced out-of-phase T1-weighted fast multi-planar spoiled gradient-recalled echo MR image shows homogeneous enhancement of lesion (arrows).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.