AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sivananthan, M. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plein, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sivananthan, M. U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Three-Dimensional Coronary MR Angiography Performed with Subject-Specific Cardiac Acquisition Windows and Motion-Adapted Respiratory Gating

Sven Plein1, Tim R. Jones1, John P. Ridgway2 and Mohan U. Sivananthan1

1 British Heart Foundation—Cardiac MRI Unit, Rm. 170, D Fl., Jubilee Bldg., Leeds General Infirmary, Great George St., Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom.
2 Department of Medical Physics, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS1 3EX, United Kingdom.



View larger version (126K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. Coronary motion assessment in 56-year-old man with history of lateral wall myocardial infarction. First phase from 30-phase horizontal long-axis cine MR image acquired with steady-state free precession pulse sequence shows right coronary artery (white arrow) and circumflex artery in cross section (black arrow).

 


View larger version (72K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. Coronary motion assessment in 56-year-old man with history of lateral wall myocardial infarction. Every third phase shown from same cine MR image as in A, with delay times after R-wave of 43-763 msec. Right coronary artery and circumflex artery can be seen in all phases. White circle represents position of right coronary artery at end-diastole to illustrate in-plane coronary motion in subsequent phases of cardiac cycle. There is no perceptible motion of coronary arteries between last three images (delay times, 603-764 msec). Subject-specific trigger delay for coronary MR angiography was therefore set to 603 msec, and acquisition window was set to 161 msec in this patient.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Scatterplot shows subject-specific trigger delays determined from coronary motion scan versus R-R interval. Dotted line represents trigger delay as suggested by Stuber et al. [10]. Solid line represents trigger delays calculated with empirically modified formula.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Bar chart shows means and standard deviations (error bars) of subject-specific trigger delays as function of mean heart rate (rounded to nearest multiple of 5 beats per minute [bpm]). Large error bars reflect wide variation of subject-specific trigger delays at similar heart rates.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Scatterplot shows duration of subject-specific data acquisition window versus mean R-R interval. Dotted line represents acquisition window used for conventional acquisition. Subject-specific acquisition windows are longer in all subjects compared with conventional acquisition windows.

 


View larger version (148K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5A. 68-year-old man with history of inferior myocardial infarction. Reformatted three-dimensional (3D) coronary MR angiogram of right coronary artery acquired with conventional 3D navigator-gated technique reveals midvessel occlusion (arrow).

 


View larger version (137K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5B. 68-year-old man with history of inferior myocardial infarction. Reformatted 3D coronary MR angiogram of right coronary artery at same level as A but acquired with subject-specific acquisition window and motion-adapted gating shows similar image quality as in A and also reveals occlusion (arrow) at mid vessel.

 


View larger version (103K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5C. 68-year-old man with history of inferior myocardial infarction. Coronary radiographic angiogram that corresponds to A and B confirms occlusion (arrow) of right coronary artery.

 


View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6A. 63-year-old man with suspected coronary artery disease. Reformatted three-dimensional (3D) coronary MR angiogram of left coronary system acquired with conventional 3D navigator-gated technique shows normal anatomy of left anterior descending artery (white arrow) and first diagonal branch (black arrow).

 


View larger version (120K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6B. 63-year-old man with suspected coronary artery disease. Reformatted 3D coronary MR angiogram of left coronary system at same level as A but acquired with subject-specific acquisition window and motion-adapted gating reveals similar image quality as in A and shows normal anatomy of left anterior descending artery (white arrow) and first diagonal branch (black arrow).

 


View larger version (132K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6C. 63-year-old man with suspected coronary artery disease. Coronary radiographic angiogram that corresponds to A and B shows normal anatomy of left anterior descending artery (white arrow) and first diagonal branch (black arrow).

 


View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Reformatted MR images of right coronary arteries from all five volunteers in comparison group. MR images in top row were acquired with conventional three-dimensional navigator-gated MR angiography technique. Corresponding MR images in bottom row were acquired with subject-specific acquisition windows and motion-adapted gating. Heart rate in beats per minute (bpm) and length of subject-specific acquisition windows were (from left to right) 52 bpm/154 msec, 80 bpm/85 msec, 85 bpm/112 msec, 65 bpm/145 msec, and 50 bpm/169 msec.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.