AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lomoschitz, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Imhof, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lomoschitz, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Imhof, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Comparison of Imaging-Guided and Non–Imaging-Guided Quantitative Sonography of the Calcaneus with Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry of the Spine and Femur

F. M. Lomoschitz1, S. Grampp1, C. B. Henk1, K. F. Linnau1, C. R. Kresta1, H. Resch2 and H. Imhof1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern, A-1060 Vienna, Austria.



View larger version (197K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. —63-year-old woman with osteoporosis. White circle on digital sonogram of calcaneus shows automatically depicted region of interest at area of lowest attenuation.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. —Scattergram shows relationship between dual X-ray absorptiometry of spine (L1–L4) T-score and non–imaging-guided quantitative sonography T-score in all women (n = 73) (95% confidence intervals are indicated by dotted lines). r = 0.41, p < 0.001.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. —Scattergram shows relationship between dual X-ray absorptiometry of spine (L1–L4) T-score and imaging-guided quantitative sonography T-score in all women (n = 73) (95% confidence intervals are indicated by dotted lines). r = 0.35, p < 0.001.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. —Scattergram shows relationship between imaging-guided quantitative sonography T-score and non–imaging-guided quantitative sonography T-score in all women (n = 73) (95% confidence intervals are indicated by dotted lines). r = 0.63, p < 0.0001.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.