Increase in Cancer Detection and Recall Rates with Independent Double Interpretation of Screening Mammography
Susan C. Harvey1,
Berta Geller2,
Robert G. Oppenheimer1,
Melanie Pinet1,
Leslie Riddell2 and
Brian Garra1
1 Department of Radiology, Fletcher Allen Health Care, University of Vermont
College of Medicine, UHC Campus, Burlington, VT 05401.
2 The Office of Health Promotion Research, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
05401.

View larger version (103K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1A. Asymptomatic 47-year-old woman. Mediolateral oblique
(A) and craniocaudal (B) images from screening mammogram show
cluster of pleomorphic calcifications in left breast (arrows) that
were overlooked by first reviewer. Second reviewer recommended additional
mammographic evaluation.
|
|

View larger version (110K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1B. Asymptomatic 47-year-old woman. Mediolateral oblique
(A) and craniocaudal (B) images from screening mammogram show
cluster of pleomorphic calcifications in left breast (arrows) that
were overlooked by first reviewer. Second reviewer recommended additional
mammographic evaluation.
|
|

View larger version (168K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1C. Asymptomatic 47-year-old woman. Spot compression
magnification mediolateral (C) and craniocaudal (D) images show
calcifications (arrows) in left breast in greater detail. In
D, calcifications have linear distribution. Histologic analysis of
excisional biopsy specimen revealed ductal carcinoma in situ associated with
calcifications with no evidence of infiltrating carcinoma.
|
|

View larger version (152K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1D. Asymptomatic 47-year-old woman. Spot compression
magnification mediolateral (C) and craniocaudal (D) images show
calcifications (arrows) in left breast in greater detail. In
D, calcifications have linear distribution. Histologic analysis of
excisional biopsy specimen revealed ductal carcinoma in situ associated with
calcifications with no evidence of infiltrating carcinoma.
|
|

View larger version (141K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2A. Asymptomatic 57-year-old woman. Mediolateral oblique
(A) and craniocaudal (B) images from screening mammogram show
subtle area of density in right central subareolar region (arrows)
that was overlooked by first reviewer. Second reviewer recommended additional
mammographic and sonographic evaluation.
|
|

View larger version (144K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2B. Asymptomatic 57-year-old woman. Mediolateral oblique
(A) and craniocaudal (B) images from screening mammogram show
subtle area of density in right central subareolar region (arrows)
that was overlooked by first reviewer. Second reviewer recommended additional
mammographic and sonographic evaluation.
|
|

View larger version (111K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2C. Asymptomatic 57-year-old woman. Spot compression
magnification mediolateral (C) and craniocaudal (D) images show
dense tissue without focal defined mass in right central subareolar
region.
|
|

View larger version (121K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2D. Asymptomatic 57-year-old woman. Spot compression
magnification mediolateral (C) and craniocaudal (D) images show
dense tissue without focal defined mass in right central subareolar
region.
|
|

View larger version (163K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2E. Asymptomatic 57-year-old woman. Sonogram shows 0.7-cm
hypoechoic solid mass in right breast at 12:30-o'clock position 3 cm from
nipple (arrows) in region of density seen on screening mammogram.
Analysis of sonographically guided 14-gauge automated large core biopsy
specimen revealed infiltrating ductal carcinoma. At mastectomy, 4.0-cm
infiltrating ductal carcinoma was found. In addition, axillary nodes were
found to be positive for metastatic disease.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.