AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steingruber, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jaschke, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steingruber, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jaschke, W. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Pretransplantation Evaluation of the Cirrhotic Liver with Explantation Correlation: Accuracy of CT Arterioportography and Digital Subtraction Hepatic Angiography in Revealing Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Iris E. Steingruber1, Ammar Mallouhi1, Benedikt V. Czermak1, Peter Waldenberger1, Eva Gassner1, Felix Offner2, Andreas Chemelli1, Alfred Koenigsrainer3, Wolfgang Vogel4 and Werner R. Jaschke1

1 Department of Radiology, Kurt Amplatz Center, Innsbruck University Hospital, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
2 Institute of Pathology, Feldkirch Academic Teaching Hospital, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria.
3 Department of Transplantation-Surgery, Innsbruck University Hospital, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
4 Department of Gastroenterology, Innsbruck University Hospital, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. —Graphs show receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves representing findings of CT arterioportography (dotted line) and digital subtraction angiography (solid line), separately and combined (dashed line) in all patients. Parametric ROC models were performed for detection of any hepatocellular carcinoma by reviewer 1 for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography and team 1 for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combination. Area under ROC curve was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55–0.78) for CT arterioportography; 0.78 (95% CI, 0.68–0.88) for digital subtraction angiography; and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72–0.91) for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combination.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. —Graphs show receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves representing findings of CT arterioportography (dotted line) and digital subtraction angiography (solid line), separately and combined (dashed line) in all patients. Parametric ROC models were performed for detection of any hepatocellular carcinoma by reviewer 2 for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography and team 2 for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combination. Area under ROC curve was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59–0.81) for CT arterioportography; 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75–0.93) for digital subtraction angiography; and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76–0.93) for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combination.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A. —Graphs show receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves representing findings of CT arterioportography (dotted line) and digital subtraction angiography (solid line), separately and combined (dashed line), in all patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Parametric ROC models were performed for detection of any hepatocellular carcinoma by reviewer 1 for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography and team 1 for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combination. Area under ROC curve was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30–0.59) for CT arterioportography; 0.67 (95% CI, 0.53–0.81) for digital subtraction angiography; and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.54–0.82) for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combination.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B. —Graphs show receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves representing findings of CT arterioportography (dotted line) and digital subtraction angiography (solid line), separately and combined (dashed line), in all patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Parametric ROC models were performed for detection of any hepatocellular carcinoma by reviewer 2 for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography and team 2 for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combination. Area under ROC curve was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.35–0.65) for CT arterioportography; 0.73 (95% CI, 0.59–0.87) for digital subtraction angiography; and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.59–0.87) for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combination.

 


View larger version (140K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. —61-year-old man with cirrhosis due to unknown cause. CT arterioportogram shows nodular perfusion defect (black arrow) in segment VI, which was interpreted as hepatocellular carcinoma. Image also shows severe ascites (small white arrow) and portosystemic shunt (large white arrow) combined with varices in abdominal wall (arrowhead) indicating advanced cirrhosis.

 


View larger version (168K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. —61-year-old man with cirrhosis due to unknown cause. Selective digital subtraction hepatic angiogram depicts lobulated moderately hypervascular lesion (arrow) in right liver lobe. Lesion was characterized as non—hepatocellular carcinoma with certainty by both reviewers. Combining A and B resulted in ruling out hepatocellular carcinoma.

 


View larger version (157K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C. —61-year-old man with cirrhosis due to unknown cause. Corresponding transverse section from explanted liver confirms presence of lesion (arrowheads) in segment VI. Although uncommon in cirrhosis, cavernous hemangioma was revealed at pathologic examination (not shown) that ruled out presence of malignancy.

 


View larger version (150K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. —59-year-old woman with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C and true-positive findings of poorly differentiated 8-mm hepatocellular carcinoma on CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography. CT arterioportogram shows nodular perfusion defect (arrow) in segment VII.

 


View larger version (129K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. —59-year-old woman with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C and true-positive findings of poorly differentiated 8-mm hepatocellular carcinoma on CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography. Selective digital subtraction hepatic angiogram depicts nodular hypervascular lesion (arrow) with definite tumor stain. Combining A and B supported presence of hepatocellular carcinoma with certainty.

 


View larger version (131K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4C. —59-year-old woman with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C and true-positive findings of poorly differentiated 8-mm hepatocellular carcinoma on CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography. Corresponding transverse section from explanted liver confirms presence of 0.8-cm hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow) in segment VII.

 


View larger version (153K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5A. —52-year-old man with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C and true-positive findings of 1.5-cm well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma on CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography. CT arterioportogram shows nodular perfusion defect (arrow) in segment VI.

 


View larger version (151K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5B. —52-year-old man with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C and true-positive findings of 1.5-cm well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma on CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography. Selective digital subtraction hepatic angiogram shows nodular tumor stain (arrow). Combining A and B supported presence of hepatocellular carcinoma with certainty.

 


View larger version (111K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5C. —52-year-old man with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C and true-positive findings of 1.5-cm well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma on CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography. Corresponding transverse section from explanted liver confirms presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow) in segment VI.

 


View larger version (140K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6A. —57-year-old man with cirrhosis due to hematochromatosis and false-positive findings on CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography. CT arterioportogram shows nodular perfusion defect (arrow) in segment V lateral to gallbladder. Lesion was interpreted as hepatocellular carcinoma.

 


View larger version (140K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6B. —57-year-old man with cirrhosis due to hematochromatosis and false-positive findings on CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography. Selective digital subtraction hepatic angiogram depicts nodular hypervascular lesion (arrow) in right liver lobe. Lesion was interpreted as hepatocellular carcinoma. Combining A and B supported presence of hepatocellular carcinoma with certainty.

 


View larger version (149K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6C. —57-year-old man with cirrhosis due to hematochromatosis and false-positive findings on CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography. Corresponding transverse section from explanted liver confirms presence of nodular lesion (arrowheads) lateral to gallbladder. Microscopic examination (not shown) revealed conglomerate of regenerative nodules and ruled out presence of malignancy.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.