Detection of Coronary Calcifications: Feasibility of Dose Reduction with a Body WeightAdapted Examination Protocol
A. H. Mahnken1,
J. E. Wildberger1,
J. Simon2,
R. Koos3,
T. G. Flohr2,
S. Schaller2 and
R. W. Günther1
1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology, Aachen,
University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.
2 Siemens Medical Solutions, Siemensstr., D-91301 Forchheim, Germany.
3 Medical Clinic I, University of Technology, Aachen, University Hospital,
D-52074 Aachen, Germany.

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Scatterplot shows ratio between body weight (kg) and image noise (H)
for nonoverlapping image reconstruction at 133 mAseff.
r2 = 0.301, slope = 0.081 H/kg, intersection = 11.956
H.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Scatterplot shows ratio between body mass index (kg/m2)
and image noise (H) for nonoverlapping image reconstruction at 133
mAseff. r2 = 0.370, slope = 0.378 H/kg per
millimeter squared, intersection = 8.163 H.
|
|

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Scatterplot shows ratio between body weight (kg) and image noise (H)
for nonoverlapping image reconstruction with body weightadapted tube
current time setting. r2 = 0.225, slope = 0.054 H/kg,
intersection = 14.528 H.
|
|

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Scatterplot shows ratio between body mass index (kg/m2)
and image noise (H) for nonoverlapping image reconstruction with body
weightadapted tube current time setting. r2 =
0.275, slope = 0.190 H/kg per millimeter squared, intersection = 14.210 H.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.