AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Hoe, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Vanhoenacker, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Hoe, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Vanhoenacker, P. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using ECG-Gated Multidetector CT: Effect of Individually Optimized Image-Reconstruction Windows on Image Quality and Measurement Reproducibility

Lieven R. Van Hoe1, Kristof G. De Meerleer, Peter Ph. Leyman and Piet K. Vanhoenacker

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Moorselbaan 164, Aalst 9300 Belgium.



View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. 64-year-old man with atypical chest pain. Percentage of interscan variability was 54%, 109%, and 70% for images calculated at 60%, 50%, and 40% of R-R interval, respectively (results based on evaluation of all coronary arteries). Images shown in different figure parts are consecutively reconstructed axial slices with 3-mm slice width and 1.5-mm overlap. Unenhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) images reconstructed at 60% of R-R interval and obtained with scan 1 show heavily calcified left anterior descending artery. Calculated calcium mass value for entire left anterior descending artery was 14 mg.

 


View larger version (95K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. 64-year-old man with atypical chest pain. Percentage of interscan variability was 54%, 109%, and 70% for images calculated at 60%, 50%, and 40% of R-R interval, respectively (results based on evaluation of all coronary arteries). Images shown in different figure parts are consecutively reconstructed axial slices with 3-mm slice width and 1.5-mm overlap. Unenhanced MDCT images reconstructed at 60% of R-R interval and obtained with scan 2 show heavily calcified left anterior descending artery. Calculated calcium mass value for entire left anterior descending artery was 35 mg. Note that calcifications are visible on more slices when compared with A. Finding suggests different motion patterns of left anterior descending artery along craniocaudal axis during scanning (different speed or direction of coronary motion or both).

 


View larger version (94K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1C. 64-year-old man with atypical chest pain. Percentage of interscan variability was 54%, 109%, and 70% for images calculated at 60%, 50%, and 40% of R-R interval, respectively (results based on evaluation of all coronary arteries). Images shown in different figure parts are consecutively reconstructed axial slices with 3-mm slice width and 1.5-mm overlap. Unenhanced MDCT images reconstructed at 50% of R-R interval and obtained with scan 1 show that artery is well visualized, but no calcium is detected (density, < 130 H). Calculated calcium mass value for entire left anterior descending artery is 0 mg. Apparent absence of calcium reflects presence of data gaps that can be explained only by rapid coronary motion.

 


View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1D. 64-year-old man with atypical chest pain. Percentage of interscan variability was 54%, 109%, and 70% for images calculated at 60%, 50%, and 40% of R-R interval, respectively (results based on evaluation of all coronary arteries). Images shown in different figure parts are consecutively reconstructed axial slices with 3-mm slice width and 1.5-mm overlap. Unenhanced MDCT images reconstructed at 50% of R-R interval and obtained with scan 2 show heavily calcified left anterior descending artery. Calculated calcium mass value for entire left anterior descending artery was 42 mg.

 


View larger version (95K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1E. 64-year-old man with atypical chest pain. Percentage of interscan variability was 54%, 109%, and 70% for images calculated at 60%, 50%, and 40% of R-R interval, respectively (results based on evaluation of all coronary arteries). Images shown in different figure parts are consecutively reconstructed axial slices with 3-mm slice width and 1.5-mm overlap. Unenhanced CT images reconstructed at 40% of R-R interval and obtained with scan 1 show left anterior descending artery with several calcific plaques. Calculated calcium mass value for entire left anterior descending artery was 4 mg.

 


View larger version (89K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1F. 64-year-old man with atypical chest pain. Percentage of interscan variability was 54%, 109%, and 70% for images calculated at 60%, 50%, and 40% of R-R interval, respectively (results based on evaluation of all coronary arteries). Images shown in different figure parts are consecutively reconstructed axial slices with 3-mm slice width and 1.5-mm overlap. Unenhanced CT images reconstructed at 40% of the R-R wave interval are obtained with scan 2. When compared with that in E, left anterior descending artery shows more homogeneous and more extensive pattern of calcification. Calculated calcium mass value for entire left anterior descending artery was 23 mg.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Scatterplot shows correlation between percentage of interscan variability using optimized image-reconstruction window and calcium mass in individual patients (r = –0.24). Interscan variability tends to be lower in patients with higher values for calcium mass; however, large scatter can be observed.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.