AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bryce, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Coakley, F. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bryce, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Coakley, F. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

CT Signs of Hepatofugal Portal Venous Flow in Patients with Cirrhosis

Thomas J. Bryce1, Benjamin M. Yeh1, Aliya Qayyum1, Preeyacha Pacharn2, Nathan M. Bass3, Ying Lu1 and Fergus V. Coakley1

1 Department of Medicine and Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Section, University of California at San Francisco, Box 0628, 505 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143-0628.
2 Department of Radiology, Mahidol University, 2 Prannok Rd., Bangkok, 10700 Thailand.
3 Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California at San Francisco, Box 0538, 505 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143-0538.



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diagram shows diameters of main portal vein in patients with hepatopetal flow versus hepatofugal flow. Note that main portal vein diameter of less than 1 cm is highly specific for hepatofugal flow.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Diagram shows receiver operating characteristic (ROC) values achieved using small main portal vein diameter to predict hepatofugal flow in main portal vein in patients with cirrhosis. Operating points achieved by predicting hepatofugal flow when main portal vein diameter was less than 1 cm are shown for observer 1 (x) and observer 2 ({Delta}). Note that at appropriate operating points, this sign is highly specific for hepatofugal flow. Area under ROC curve (Az) was 0.83 for observer 1 and 0.74 for observer 2.

 


View larger version (143K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. 73-year-old woman with cirrhosis due to alcohol abuse. Axial CT scan obtained during portal venous phase shows small (8 mm in diameter) main portal vein (arrow); this finding strongly correlates with hepatofugal flow.

 


View larger version (117K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. 73-year-old woman with cirrhosis due to alcohol abuse. Sonogram shows hepatofugal flow in main portal vein.

 


View larger version (143K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. 49-year-old man with cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C infection. CT scan obtained during arterial phase shows contrast enhancement of portal vein. This sign is thought to indicate hepatofugal portal venous flow.

 


View larger version (90K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. 49-year-old man with cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C infection. Doppler sonogram obtained 1 day earlier than A, however, reveals hepatopetal flow.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.