AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berná, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Flores, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berná, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Flores, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Panoramic Versus Conventional Radiography of Scaphoid Fractures

Juan D. Berná1, German Chavarria2, Francisco Albaladejo2, Luis Meseguer2, Arturo Pellicer2, Miguel A. Sánchez-Cañizares2 and Domingo Pérez-Flores3

1 Department of Radiology, University General Hospital, C.E.P. Quesada Sanz c/Dr. Quesada Sans s/n, Murcia 30005, Spain.
2 Department of Traumatology, University General Hospital, Murcia 30005, Spain.
3 Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Espinardo, Murcia 30100, Spain.



View larger version (173K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. 19-year-old man with wrist trauma. Conventional radiographic and panoramic examinations were performed 3 months after injury because of doubtful union of scaphoid fracture. Initial conventional radiograph shows doubtful scaphoid union.

 


View larger version (158K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. 19-year-old man with wrist trauma. Conventional radiographic and panoramic examinations were performed 3 months after injury because of doubtful union of scaphoid fracture. Panoramic radiograph shows fracture partially united (arrow). 1 = pisiform bone, 2 = triquetral bone, 3 = lunate bone, 4 = scaphoid bone, 5 = hamate bone, 6 = capitate bone, 7 = trapezoid bone, 8 = trapezium bone, D = centering guide of device.

 


View larger version (163K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1C. 19-year-old man with wrist trauma. Conventional radiographic and panoramic examinations were performed 3 months after injury because of doubtful union of scaphoid fracture. Conventional radiograph obtained 5 months after trauma shows fracture partially united, as seen in B.

 


View larger version (157K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A. 20-year-old man who underwent bone graft because of nonunion of scaphoid fracture. Conventional radiographs obtained 12 months after trauma show doubtful fracture union.

 


View larger version (144K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B. 20-year-old man who underwent bone graft because of nonunion of scaphoid fracture. Conventional radiographs obtained 12 months after trauma show doubtful fracture union.

 


View larger version (130K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2C. 20-year-old man who underwent bone graft because of nonunion of scaphoid fracture. Panoramic radiograph obtained at same time as A and B shows nonunion (fracture type D1 [15]).

 


View larger version (155K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2D. 20-year-old man who underwent bone graft because of nonunion of scaphoid fracture. Panoramic radiograph obtained 4 months after implant shows fracture union.

 


View larger version (178K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. 49-year-old woman with acute trauma of wrist. Conventional radiography and panoramic radiography were performed 2 weeks after injury. Conventional radiographs shows no evidence of fracture.

 


View larger version (147K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. 49-year-old woman with acute trauma of wrist. Conventional radiography and panoramic radiography were performed 2 weeks after injury. Conventional radiographs shows no evidence of fracture.

 


View larger version (104K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C. 49-year-old woman with acute trauma of wrist. Conventional radiography and panoramic radiography were performed 2 weeks after injury. Panoramic radiograph shows fracture line (arrow) (fracture type A2 [15]).

 


View larger version (162K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. 20-year-old man with wrist trauma. Conventional radiography and panoramic radiography were performed 5 months after injury. Conventional radiograph shows doubtful union.

 


View larger version (119K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. 20-year-old man with wrist trauma. Conventional radiography and panoramic radiography were performed 5 months after injury. Panoramic radiograph shows delayed union (fracture type C [15]).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.