AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodwin, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Macroscopic Structure of Articular Cartilage of the Tibial Plateau: Influence of a Characteristic Matrix Architecture on MRI Appearance

Douglas W. Goodwin1, Youssef Zaim Wadghiri2, Haoqin Zhu3, Christopher J. Vinton4, Eric D. Smith5 and Jeff F. Dunn1

1 Department of Radiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Dr., Lebanon, NH 03756.
2 Skirball Institute–NYU Medical Center, 540 First Ave., New York, NY 10016.
3 Millennium Technology Inc., 465-5600 Parkwood Way, Richmond, BC, Canada.
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Physical Rehabilitation, UMass Memorial Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave. N, Worchester, MA 01655.
5 National Orthopedic Imaging Associates, 1260 S Eliseo Dr., Greenbrae, CA 94904.



View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. 23-year-old man with knee pain. Typical appearance of articular cartilage on routine clinical imaging is shown on this coronal intermediate-weighted fast spin-echo 1.5-T image (TR/TEeff, 2,000/19). Thin low-signal-intensity surface layer (s), higher-signal-intensity transitional layer (t), and low-signal-intensity deep layer (d) with vertical striations are present. Relative thickness of these three layers is significantly different in central region of lateral plateau (cent) compared with submeniscal region (sm), in which transitional and surface layers are much thicker. Image plane includes posterior portion of medial plateau with larger submeniscal region (arrowheads).

 


View larger version (94K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A. Lateral tibial plateau of 35-year-old woman. B0 = main magnetic field. On midcoronal spin-echo image (TR/TE, 1,000/14; field of view, 45 mm; slice thickness, 1 mm; matrix size, 512 x 512), variations in signal intensity produce characteristic three-layer appearance. In central region of plateau (c), in which higher-signal-intensity transitional layer (t) is thin and radial striations extend across thick deep layer (d), minor fibrillation is seen at low-signal-intensity surface (s). In submeniscal region (sm) and at tibial eminence (e), transitional layer is much thicker. Chemical shift produces low-signal-intensity interface at subchondral bone (arrowheads). Surface of tibial eminence (short arrows) does not interface with saline and cannot be clearly visualized because of contact of wax enclosure with joint surface.

 


View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B. Lateral tibial plateau of 35-year-old woman. B0 = main magnetic field. On corresponding T2 map, changes in T2 parallel changes in signal intensity. Peak T2 values are located in middle of transitional layer. e = tibial eminence, c = central region of plateau, sm = submeniscal region.

 


View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. 78-year-old man with lateral tibial plateau removed at arthroplasty. B0 = main magnetic field. Sagittal spin-echo image (TR/TE, 1,000/14; field of view, 45 mm; slice thickness, 1 mm; matrix size, 512 x 512) of submeniscal region scanned with surface perpendicular to B0 shows relatively high-signal-intensity transitional layer (black arrow) and lower-signal-intensity deep layer (white arrow).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. 78-year-old man with lateral tibial plateau removed at arthroplasty. B0 = main magnetic field. T2 map has orientation and location identical to that of A. Transitional layer T2 (black arrow) is longer than deep layer T2 (white arrow).

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C. 78-year-old man with lateral tibial plateau removed at arthroplasty. B0 = main magnetic field. Spin-echo MRI shows sample oriented at 55° to B0 with slice location and imaging parameters identical to those in A. Deep layer (white arrow) signal intensity is increased, and orientation effect is also present in transitional layer (black arrow), in which striations of lower signal intensity are present on sample scanned at 55°.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3D. 78-year-old man with lateral tibial plateau removed at arthroplasty. B0 = main magnetic field. T2 map shows orientation and location identical to that of C. Deep layer T2 (white arrow) is longer, and transitional layer T2 (black arrow) is shorter than that in map acquired with surface perpendicular to B0 (B).

 


View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3E. 78-year-old man with lateral tibial plateau removed at arthroplasty. B0 = main magnetic field. Low-power scanning electron micrograph shows same sample (A–D) acquired after tissue was first cut into 2-mm-thick slab in plane of imaging and then fractured perpendicular to that plane. Cut surface (CS) faces viewer and subchondral bone (B) is at bottom of image. Plane of fracture extends perpendicularly from subchondral bone in deep region (small arrows) of tissue and then curves into plane of joint surface (large arrow). Level of curve matches location of transitional layer on spin-echo image (A) and T2 map (B) obtained with surface perpendicular to B0.

 


View larger version (81K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. Medial tibial plateau of 55-year-old woman. sm = submeniscal region. Spin-echo image (TR/TE, 1,000/20; field of view, 50 mm; slice thickness, 1 mm; matrix size, 512 x 512) was obtained in midcoronal plane. Single arrow = thin and superficial transitional layer, double arrows = deep layer.

 


View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. Medial tibial plateau of 55-year-old woman. sm = submeniscal region. Spin-echo MRI was obtained in midsagittal plane with imaging parameters identical to those in A. Single arrow = thin and superficial transitional layer, double arrows = deep layer.

 


View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4C. Medial tibial plateau of 55-year-old woman. sm = submeniscal region. Photograph shows that specimen corresponding to A and B was fractured in midcoronal plane. Superficial level of tissue curvature in central region of plateau (single arrow) correlates with thin and superficial transitional layer on MRI (single arrow, A and B). In submeniscal region of joint, more oblique curvature of cartilage is present at same location where increases in relative thickness of surface and transitional layers are apparent on MRI. Vertical striations in deep layer (double arrows, A and B) on MRIs correspond to location of columnlike arrangement of tissue (double arrows) in deepest region of cartilage, as displayed on this fractured specimen.

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5A. Lateral tibial plateau of 58-year-old man. Coronal image (TR/TE, 1,000/20; field of view, 50 mm; matrix size, 512 x 256) was obtained as multislice acquisition (slice thickness, 1 mm; interslice gap, 4 mm). Prominent high-signal-intensity transitional layer (black arrow) on this coronal plane image of posterior aspect of tibial plateau reflects large amount of submeniscal cartilage included in plane of imaging. No lower-signal-intensity deep layer is evident at margin of joint (white arrow). B0 = main magnetic field.

 


View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5B. Lateral tibial plateau of 58-year-old man. Sagittal spin-echo MRI was obtained with same parameters as A. Only thin deep layer (single arrow) is apparent on this far lateral sagittal plane image in submeniscal region. Double arrows indicate higher signal intensity at posterior margin of joint. B0 = main magnetic field.

 


View larger version (94K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5C. Lateral tibial plateau of 58-year-old man. Photograph shows specimen fractured in same plane of imaging as in B. Regional changes in shape of matrix correlate with regional variations in layering of signal intensity displayed on spin-echo image (B). Location where matrix curves out of plane of fracture (arrows), resulting in large overhanging edge, corresponds to higher signal intensity at posterior margin of joint (double arrows, B).

 


View larger version (77K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Drawing shows architecture of extracellular matrix of tibial plateau. Viewed from above (a), split lines in peripheral region of plateau are arranged in wheel-spoke pattern. After fracture sectioning in coronal plane, surface of anterior half is viewed en face (b) and then viewed at oblique orientation (c). In central portion of tibial plateau (1), cartilage has columnlike structure that is perpendicular to underlying subchondral bone and curves at superficial level (2). At tibial eminence (3), cartilage maintains columnlike structure, but instead of perpendicular alignment relative to subchondral bone, its alignment approaches weight-bearing axis of joint. At submeniscal region of joint (4), tissue curves both away from center of joint and in annular direction perpendicular to orientation of split lines in articular surface (5).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.