AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Appel, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gilula, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Appel, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gilula, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Patients with Spinal Canal Compromise

Noah B. Appel1,2 and Louis A. Gilula3

1 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, MO 63110-1076.
2 Present address: Dallas Radiologists, P.A., 7515 Greenville Ave., Ste. 710, Dallas, TX 75231-3848.
3 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Section of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Washington University Medical Center, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63110-1076.



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. Graphics show classification of spinal canal (or spinal cord) compromise (axial representation). Graphic shows normal classification.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. Graphics show classification of spinal canal (or spinal cord) compromise (axial representation). Graphic shows category 1 classification: loss of ventral epidural space with no spinal cord deformity.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1C. Graphics show classification of spinal canal (or spinal cord) compromise (axial representation). Graphic shows category 2 classification: spinal cord deformity but no abnormal cord signal on T2-weighted images.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1D. Graphics show classification of spinal canal (or spinal cord) compromise (axial representation). Graphic shows category 3 classification: cord deformity with increased signal within cord on T2-weighted images.

 


View larger version (144K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A. 83-year-old woman with metastatic carcinoma. Axial (TR/TE, 1,785/110) (A) and sagittal (4,400/110) (B) T2-weighted images show category 2 lesion with deformation of spinal cord at T9 level.

 


View larger version (136K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B. 83-year-old woman with metastatic carcinoma. Axial (TR/TE, 1,785/110) (A) and sagittal (4,400/110) (B) T2-weighted images show category 2 lesion with deformation of spinal cord at T9 level.

 


View larger version (151K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. 84-year-old woman with osteoporotic compression fracture. Axial (TR/TE, 6,610/112) (A) and sagittal (6,517/130) (B) T2-weighted images of category 2 lesion show spinal cord deformity without abnormal spinal cord signal at T12.

 


View larger version (139K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. 84-year-old woman with osteoporotic compression fracture. Axial (TR/TE, 6,610/112) (A) and sagittal (6,517/130) (B) T2-weighted images of category 2 lesion show spinal cord deformity without abnormal spinal cord signal at T12.

 


View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. 51-year-old woman with multiple myeloma. Axial (TR/TE, 5,565/112) (A) and sagittal (5,664/112) (B) T2-weighted images of category 3 lesion. At T11 level, spinal cord is deformed with increased signal (arrow, A and arrowheads, B) within cord itself.

 


View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. 51-year-old woman with multiple myeloma. Axial (TR/TE, 5,565/112) (A) and sagittal (5,664/112) (B) T2-weighted images of category 3 lesion. At T11 level, spinal cord is deformed with increased signal (arrow, A and arrowheads, B) within cord itself.

 


View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5A. Examples of polymethylmethacrylate leakage seen on fluoroscopic spot radiographs. Patients experienced no complications related to leakage of polymethylmethacrylate mixture. Frontal (A) and lateral (B) radiographs of 84-year-old woman with osteoporatic compression fracture (same patient as in Fig. 3A, 3B) with needles placed into adjacent segments at T12 and L1 led to polymethylmethacrylate pasing through intervening disk (A), anteriorly to form bridge (A and B) between these two segments. This patient had preprocedure pain score (lowest–highest, 0–10) of 8, postprocedural score of 0, and was "better" at 6-month follow-up.

 


View larger version (135K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5B. Examples of polymethylmethacrylate leakage seen on fluoroscopic spot radiographs. Patients experienced no complications related to leakage of polymethylmethacrylate mixture. Frontal (A) and lateral (B) radiographs of 84-year-old woman with osteoporatic compression fracture (same patient as in Fig. 3A, 3B) with needles placed into adjacent segments at T12 and L1 led to polymethylmethacrylate pasing through intervening disk (A), anteriorly to form bridge (A and B) between these two segments. This patient had preprocedure pain score (lowest–highest, 0–10) of 8, postprocedural score of 0, and was "better" at 6-month follow-up.

 


View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5C. Examples of polymethylmethacrylate leakage seen on fluoroscopic spot radiographs. Patients experienced no complications related to leakage of polymethylmethacrylate mixture. Frontal (C) and lateral (D) spot radiographs of 51-year-old woman (same patient as in Fig. 4A, 4B) with small amount of paravertebral leakage present bilaterally. This patient had preprocedural pain score (lowest–highest, 0–10) of 7, immediate postprocedural score of 3.5, and was "better" at 3-month follow-up and "same" at 6-month follow-up.

 


View larger version (120K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5D. Examples of polymethylmethacrylate leakage seen on fluoroscopic spot radiographs. Patients experienced no complications related to leakage of polymethylmethacrylate mixture. Frontal (C) and lateral (D) spot radiographs of 51-year-old woman (same patient as in Fig. 4A, 4B) with small amount of paravertebral leakage present bilaterally. This patient had preprocedural pain score (lowest–highest, 0–10) of 7, immediate postprocedural score of 3.5, and was "better" at 3-month follow-up and "same" at 6-month follow-up.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.