AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schettino, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lepor, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schettino, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lepor, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Impact of Fusion of Indium-111 Capromab Pendetide Volume Data Sets with Those from MRI or CT in Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Chris J. Schettino1,2, Elissa L. Kramer1,3, Marilyn E. Noz1, Samir Taneja4, Priya Padmanabhan4 and Herbert Lepor4

1 Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016.
3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, New York University Medical Center, Tisch Hospital, 550 First Ave., HW 231, New York, NY 10016.
4 Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016.



View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. —Example of fused volume showing slices in all three orthogonal planes. Slices on left are original floating volume. Slices in middle show transformed floating volume superimposed on and blended with original CT volume (note match of bone structures, especially on sagittal view in bottom row). Slices on right show original CT volume.

 


View larger version (69K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. —Fused image showing false-positive Prosta-Scint (Cytogen) study. Uptake originally thought to represent lymph nodes was found after fusion to be vessel (1, arrow) and bowel (2, arrow) uptake on fusion. Upper panel shows original Prosta-Scint transverse slice, and lower panel shows Prosta-Scint transverse slice fused and superimposed on matching MRI slice.

 


View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. —Fused image showing true-positive Prosta-Scint (Cytogen) uptake. Uptake was found after fusion to represent disease in lymph node (arrows). Upper panel shows original Prosta-Scint transverse slice, and lower panel shows Prosta-Scint transverse slice fused and superimposed on matching MRI slice.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.