HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Haapamaki, V. V. Articles by Koskinen, S. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Haapamaki, V. V. Articles by Koskinen, S. K. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Ankle and Foot Injuries: Analysis of MDCT Findings

¹ Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Töölö Trauma Center, Topeliuksenkatu 5, Helsinki FIN-00029, Finland.
² Research Institute of Military Medicine, Mannerheimintie 164, Helsinki FIN-00300, Finland.

View larger version (101K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1A. —66-year-old woman with right ankle injury due to simple fall. Conventional radiographs in anteroposterior (A), mortise (B), and lateral (C) views show bimalleolar fracture (arrows, A).

View larger version (98K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1B. —66-year-old woman with right ankle injury due to simple fall. Conventional radiographs in anteroposterior (A), mortise (B), and lateral (C) views show bimalleolar fracture (arrows, A).

View larger version (107K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1C. —66-year-old woman with right ankle injury due to simple fall. Conventional radiographs in anteroposterior (A), mortise (B), and lateral (C) views show bimalleolar fracture (arrows, A).

View larger version (104K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1D. —66-year-old woman with right ankle injury due to simple fall. Coronal and sagittal multiplanar reconstructions from MDCT images reveal bimalleolar fracture (arrows, D and E) and occult posterior malleolus fracture (arrow, F) that involves more than one third of articular surface. Also, occult Chaput-Tillaux fracture (arrowhead, E) is shown in anterolateral part of tibia. Note significant tibial metaphyseal osteoporosis.

View larger version (89K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1E. —66-year-old woman with right ankle injury due to simple fall. Coronal and sagittal multiplanar reconstructions from MDCT images reveal bimalleolar fracture (arrows, D and E) and occult posterior malleolus fracture (arrow, F) that involves more than one third of articular surface. Also, occult Chaput-Tillaux fracture (arrowhead, E) is shown in anterolateral part of tibia. Note significant tibial metaphyseal osteoporosis.

View larger version (86K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1F. —66-year-old woman with right ankle injury due to simple fall. Coronal and sagittal multiplanar reconstructions from MDCT images reveal bimalleolar fracture (arrows, D and E) and occult posterior malleolus fracture (arrow, F) that involves more than one third of articular surface. Also, occult Chaput-Tillaux fracture (arrowhead, E) is shown in anterolateral part of tibia. Note significant tibial metaphyseal osteoporosis.

View larger version (95K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2A. —50-year-old woman with distortion injury in ankle due to simple fall. Conventional radiographs in anteroposterior (A), mortise (B), and lateral (C) views show no fractures.

View larger version (95K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2B. —50-year-old woman with distortion injury in ankle due to simple fall. Conventional radiographs in anteroposterior (A), mortise (B), and lateral (C) views show no fractures.

View larger version (115K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2C. —50-year-old woman with distortion injury in ankle due to simple fall. Conventional radiographs in anteroposterior (A), mortise (B), and lateral (C) views show no fractures.

View larger version (90K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2D. —50-year-old woman with distortion injury in ankle due to simple fall. Coronal multiplanar reconstruction from MDCT images shows dislocated Chaput–Tillaux fracture (arrow) in anterolateral part of tibia.

View larger version (112K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3A. —45-year-old man with calcaneal fracture due to fall from height. Conventional radiographs in anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) views from ankle and calcaneal view (C) reveal fracture line through calcaneal body and lateral malleolus avulsion fracture.

View larger version (111K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3B. —45-year-old man with calcaneal fracture due to fall from height. Conventional radiographs in anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) views from ankle and calcaneal view (C) reveal fracture line through calcaneal body and lateral malleolus avulsion fracture.

View larger version (86K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3C. —45-year-old man with calcaneal fracture due to fall from height. Conventional radiographs in anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) views from ankle and calcaneal view (C) reveal fracture line through calcaneal body and lateral malleolus avulsion fracture.

View larger version (69K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3D. —45-year-old man with calcaneal fracture due to fall from height. Sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions from MDCT images show large defect in posterior calcaneal facet (arrows, E and G) and that comminuted fracture also involves anterolateral facet and calcaneocuboid joint (arrowheads, D and H).

View larger version (66K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3E. —45-year-old man with calcaneal fracture due to fall from height. Sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions from MDCT images show large defect in posterior calcaneal facet (arrows, E and G) and that comminuted fracture also involves anterolateral facet and calcaneocuboid joint (arrowheads, D and H).

View larger version (67K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3F. —45-year-old man with calcaneal fracture due to fall from height. Sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions from MDCT images show large defect in posterior calcaneal facet (arrows, E and G) and that comminuted fracture also involves anterolateral facet and calcaneocuboid joint (arrowheads, D and H).

View larger version (89K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3G. —45-year-old man with calcaneal fracture due to fall from height. Sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions from MDCT images show large defect in posterior calcaneal facet (arrows, E and G) and that comminuted fracture also involves anterolateral facet and calcaneocuboid joint (arrowheads, D and H).

View larger version (84K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3H. —45-year-old man with calcaneal fracture due to fall from height. Sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions from MDCT images show large defect in posterior calcaneal facet (arrows, E and G) and that comminuted fracture also involves anterolateral facet and calcaneocuboid joint (arrowheads, D and H).

View larger version (68K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4A. —20-year-old man with foot injury due to fall from height. Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs show comminuted calcaneal fracture and cuboid bone fracture (arrow, A).

View larger version (53K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4B. —20-year-old man with foot injury due to fall from height. Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs show comminuted calcaneal fracture and cuboid bone fracture (arrow, A).

View larger version (69K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4C. —20-year-old man with foot injury due to fall from height. Coronal (C) and sagittal (D) multiplanar reconstruction images from MDCT images show tonguelike calcaneal fracture that involves posterior talocalcaneal facet (arrow, D) and Lisfranc fracture–dislocation between fourth metatarsal base and cuboid bone (arrowheads, C and D). Note fractured lateral aspect of cuboid bone (arrow, C).

View larger version (79K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4D. —20-year-old man with foot injury due to fall from height. Coronal (C) and sagittal (D) multiplanar reconstruction images from MDCT images show tonguelike calcaneal fracture that involves posterior talocalcaneal facet (arrow, D) and Lisfranc fracture–dislocation between fourth metatarsal base and cuboid bone (arrowheads, C and D). Note fractured lateral aspect of cuboid bone (arrow, C).

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati