High-Resolution MRI in Giant Cell Arteritis: Imaging of the Wall of the Superficial Temporal Artery
Thorsten A. Bley1,
Oliver Wieben2,
Markus Uhl1,
Jens Thiel3,
Dieter Schmidt4 and
Mathias Langer1
1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse
55, Freiburg, BW 79106, Germany.
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology-Medical Physics, University of Freiburg,
Freiburg, Germany.
3 Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Univesity of Freiburg,
Freiburg, Germany.
4 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

View larger version (127K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1A. Contrast-enhanced MR images of 4 patients with various
degrees of mural enhancement of temporal artery (arrows). No or
slight enhancement is considered physiologically normal, whereas prominent or
strong mural enhancement indicates mural inflammation. Nitroglycerine capsule
used as fiducial marker appears as white ball in A and C. No
enhancement (73-year-old woman).
|
|

View larger version (128K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1B. Contrast-enhanced MR images of 4 patients with various
degrees of mural enhancement of temporal artery (arrows). No or
slight enhancement is considered physiologically normal, whereas prominent or
strong mural enhancement indicates mural inflammation. Nitroglycerine capsule
used as fiducial marker appears as white ball in A and C. Slight
enhancement (65-year-old man).
|
|

View larger version (137K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1C. Contrast-enhanced MR images of 4 patients with various
degrees of mural enhancement of temporal artery (arrows). No or
slight enhancement is considered physiologically normal, whereas prominent or
strong mural enhancement indicates mural inflammation. Nitroglycerine capsule
used as fiducial marker appears as white ball in A and C.
Prominent enhancement (68-year-old man).
|
|

View larger version (129K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1D. Contrast-enhanced MR images of 4 patients with various
degrees of mural enhancement of temporal artery (arrows). No or
slight enhancement is considered physiologically normal, whereas prominent or
strong mural enhancement indicates mural inflammation. Nitroglycerine capsule
used as fiducial marker appears as white ball in A and C. Strong
enhancement (68-year-old man).
|
|

View larger version (172K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2A. MR images of 73-year-old man with giant cell arteritis.
Unenhanced high-resolution coronal T1-weighted 2D spin-echo sequence (TR/TE,
500/22; field of view, 120 x 120 cm2; acquisition matrix, 384
x 512) depicts frontal branch of right temporal artery
(arrow).
|
|

View larger version (155K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2B. MR images of 73-year-old man with giant cell arteritis.
Contrast-enhanced, fat-saturated T1-weighted 2D spin-echo sequence at same
position as A shows bright contrast enhancement of thickened vessel
wall, strongly indicating arteritis (arrow). Concomitant bright
signal intensity of lumen of temporal vein (arrowheads) and low
signal intensity of lumen of temporal artery are due to flow-void phenomenon
(arrow)
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.