AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rizzo, S. M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Saini, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rizzo, S. M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Saini, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Do Metallic Endoprostheses Increase Radiation Dose Associated with Automatic Tube-Current Modulation in Abdominal–Pelvic MDCT? A Phantom and Patient Study

Stefania M. R. Rizzo1, Mannudeep K. Kalra1, Michael M. Maher1, Michael A. Blake1, Thomas L. Toth2 and Sanjay Saini1

1 Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, White 270-E, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114.
2 GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI.



View larger version (88K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A. Z-modulation technique caused an increase in tube current for CT of phantom with metallic prosthesis, compared with scanning of phantom without prosthesis, with no reduction in artifacts compared with fixed-tube-current scanning. Transverse CT image, acquired with z-modulation (113 mA, 0.5-sec rotation time), of water phantom shows no streak artifacts.

 


View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B. Z-modulation technique caused an increase in tube current for CT of phantom with metallic prosthesis, compared with scanning of phantom without prosthesis, with no reduction in artifacts compared with fixed-tube-current scanning. Transverse CT image, acquired with fixed-tube-current scanning (240 mAs, 0.5-sec rotation time), of phantom with metallic prosthesis shows streak artifacts.

 


View larger version (72K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1C. Z-modulation technique caused an increase in tube current for CT of phantom with metallic prosthesis, compared with scanning of phantom without prosthesis, with no reduction in artifacts compared with fixed-tube-current scanning. Transverse CT image of phantom, acquired with z-modulation (274 mAs, 0.5-sec rotation time), with metallic prosthesis shows streak artifacts.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Line graph diagram shows tube current used for scanning phantom with and without prosthesis using z-modulation (• [solid dot] and {square} [open box], respectively), compared with fixed-tube-current scanning (x). Tube current is increased when phantom with prosthesis is scanned using z-modulation technique.

 


View larger version (105K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. Z-modulation technique caused an increase in tube current for CT of patient with metallic endoprosthesis, compared with fixed-tube-current scanning of same patient and z-modulation technique in a different patient without metallic prostheses. Transverse CT image, acquired with z-modulation (299 mA, 0.5-sec rotation time), of 64-year-old woman with pancreatic cancer shows streak artifacts due to left hip endoprosthesis.

 


View larger version (106K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. Z-modulation technique caused an increase in tube current for CT of patient with metallic endoprosthesis, compared with fixed-tube-current scanning of same patient and z-modulation technique in a different patient without metallic prostheses. Transverse CT image, acquired with fixed-tube-current scanning (240 mA, 0.5-sec rotation time), of same patient as in A shows similar streak artifacts.

 


View larger version (101K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C. Z-modulation technique caused an increase in tube current for CT of patient with metallic endoprosthesis, compared with fixed-tube-current scanning of same patient and z-modulation technique in a different patient without metallic prostheses. Transverse CT image, acquired with z-modulation (93 mA, 0.5-sec rotation time), of 60-year-old woman with gastric cancer and no metallic prosthesis shows no streak artifacts.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.