HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schlosser, T. Articles by Barkhausen, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schlosser, T. Articles by Barkhausen, J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Assessment of Left Ventricular Parameters Using 16-MDCT and New Software for Endocardial and Epicardial Border Delineation

¹ All authors: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.

View larger version (11K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. —Left ventricular end-diastolic volume assessed using MRI and CT. CTAUTO = automatic contour detection; CTMAN = manual contour tracing.

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2A. —Bland-Altman plots of end-diastolic volume. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C).

View larger version (13K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2B. —Bland-Altman plots of end-diastolic volume. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C.)

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2C. —Bland-Altman plots of end-diastolic volume. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C).

View larger version (11K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. —Left ventricular end-systolic volume assessed using MRI and CT. CTAUTO = automatic contour detection; CTMAN = manual contour tracing.

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4A. —Bland-Altman plots of end-systolic volume. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C).

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4B. —Bland-Altman plots of end-systolic volume. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C).

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4C. —Bland-Altman plots of end-systolic volume. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C).

View larger version (10K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. —Ejection fraction assessed using MRI and CT. CTAUTO = automatic contour detection; CTMAN = manual contour tracing.

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6A. —Bland-Altman plots of ejection fraction. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C).

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6B. —Bland-Altman plots of ejection fraction. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C).

View larger version (13K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6C. —Bland-Altman plots of ejection fraction. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C).

View larger version (12K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. —Left ventricular mass assessed using MRI and CT. CTAUTO = automatic contour detection; CTMAN = manual contour tracing.

View larger version (16K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8A. —Bland-Altman plots of left ventricular mass. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C).

View larger version (15K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8B. —Bland-Altman plots of left ventricular mass. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C).

View larger version (15K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8C. —Bland-Altman plots of left ventricular mass. Bland-Altman plots were assessed using MRI versus CTauto (automated contour detection, A), MRI versus CTmanual (manual tracing, B), and CTauto versus CTmanual (C).

View larger version (61K): [in a new window]   Fig. 9A. —Examples of end-diastolic and end-systolic MR and CT images. End-diastolic MR (top row) and CT images and automatically detected (center row) and manually traced (bottom row) endo- and epicardial contours. Only each second short-axis slice is displayed. See next page for end-systolic images.

View larger version (69K): [in a new window]   Fig. 9B. —Examples of end-diastolic and end-systolic MR and CT images. End-systolic MR (top row) and CT images and automatically detected (center row) and manually traced (bottom row) endo- and epicardial contours. Only each second short-axis slice is displayed. See previous page for end-diastolic images.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati