AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Ferucarbotran-Enhanced MRI Versus Triple-Phase MDCT for the Preoperative Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Seong Hyun Kim1,2, Dongil Choi1, Seung Hoon Kim1, Jae Hoon Lim1, Won Jae Lee1, Min Ju Kim1, Hyo K. Lim1 and Soon Jin Lee1

1 Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, South Korea.
2 Department of Radiology, Wonju Christian Hospital, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, 162 Ilsandong, Wonju, Kangwon-do 220-701, South Korea.



View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Receiver operating characteristic curves for triple-phase MDCT ({diamondsuit}) and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI ({half_circle}) calculated with mean values from all three observers. Mean values for area under the curve (Az) (an indicator of diagnostic accuracy) for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma on ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI and triple-phase MDCT were 0.947 ± 0.010 and 0.949 ± 0.010, respectively. Difference in mean Az values between the two techniques was not statistically significant (p = 0.799).

 


View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A. 54-year-old man with three hepatocellular carcinomas in liver. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at arterial phase shows 3.8- and 0.6-cm-diameter hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas in liver segment VII (arrows) and 0.5-cm-diameter hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in segment VIII (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B. 54-year-old man with three hepatocellular carcinomas in liver. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at delayed phase at same level as A shows washout pattern in two hepatocellular carcinomas in segment VII (arrows) and one hepatocellular carcinoma in segment VIII (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2C. 54-year-old man with three hepatocellular carcinomas in liver. Ferucarbotran-enhanced image from fat-suppressed, respiratory-triggered proton density-weighted fast spin-echo MRI (TR/TE, 5,000/18) shows two hyperintense nodules in segment VII (arrows) and one hyperintense nodule in segment VIII (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (115K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2D. 54-year-old man with three hepatocellular carcinomas in liver. Ferucarbotran-enhanced image from T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled echo acquisition in steady state MRI (TR/TE, 130/8.4; 30° flip angle) at same level as C shows two hyperintense nodules (arrows) in liver segment VII and one hyperintense nodule in segment VIII (arrowhead). All three observers interpreted segment VII and segment VIII as segments with hepatocellular carcinoma on both CT and MR images.

 


View larger version (84K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A. 51-year-old man with 1.2-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in segment VIII of liver. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at arterial phase shows hypervascular nodule (arrow) in segment VIII.

 


View larger version (92K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B. 51-year-old man with 1.2-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in segment VIII of liver. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at delayed phase at same level as A shows hypoattenuated nodule (arrow). All three observers interpreted this nodule as hepatocellular carcinoma.

 


View larger version (119K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C. 51-year-old man with 1.2-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in segment VIII of liver. Ferucarbotran-enhanced image from fat-suppressed, respiratory-triggered T2-weighted fast spin-echo MRI (TR/TE, 4,500/98) shows subtle hyperintense nodule (arrow) overlying vascular structure in segment VIII.

 


View larger version (118K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3D. 51-year-old man with 1.2-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in segment VIII of liver. Ferucarbotran-enhanced MR image from T2*-weighted fast multiplanar gradient-recalled echo acquisition in steady state (130/8.4; 30° flip angle) at same level as C also shows subtle hyperintense nodule (arrow). Two of three observers did not interpret this nodule as hepatocellular carcinoma.

 


View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A. 48-year-old man with 7.2-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VI and false-positive lesion in segment V. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at arterial phase shows large, ill-defined, heterogeneous enhancing mass (arrows) in segment VI and subtle enhancing nodule (arrowheads) in segment V. Two of three observers considered nodule in segment V to be hepatocellular carcinoma.

 


View larger version (124K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B. 48-year-old man with 7.2-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VI and false-positive lesion in segment V. Ferucarbotran-enhanced MR image from fat-suppressed, respiratory-triggered T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence (TR/TE, 4,500/98) at same level as A shows no mass in segment V other than hyperintense mass (arrows) in segment VI. None of three observers interpreted segment V as segment with hepatocellular carcinoma.

 


View larger version (118K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5A. 45-year-old man with 2.5-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VI and hemangioma in segment V. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at arterial phase shows hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow) in segment VI and hemangioma with peripheral enhancement (arrowhead) in segment V.

 


View larger version (115K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5B. 45-year-old man with 2.5-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VI and hemangioma in segment V. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at delayed phase at same level as A shows hepatocellular carcinoma with washout (arrow) and persistent enhancing hemangioma (arrowhead). All three observers interpreted these nodules as hepatocellular carcinoma and hemangioma, respectively.

 


View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5C. 45-year-old man with 2.5-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VI and hemangioma in segment V. MR image from breath-hold in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence (TR/TE, 200/4.2; 90° flip angle) before injection of contrast agent shows nodule (arrow) in segment VI that is less hypointense than hypointense nodule (arrowhead) in segment V.

 


View larger version (95K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5D. 45-year-old man with 2.5-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VI and hemangioma in segment V. Ferucarbotran-enhanced dynamic MR images from breath-hold in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence (200/4.2; 90° flip angle). Image obtained 20 sec after injection of contrast agent (D) shows hypointense hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow, D) and early peripheral enhancement of hemangioma (arrowhead, D). At 1 min after injection of contrast agent (E), image shows less hypointense nodule (arrow, E) than in D and subsequent filling-in of hemangioma (arrowhead, E). At 5 min after injection of contrast agent (F), image shows hyperintense hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow, F) and hemangioma (arrowhead, F). Liver shows decrease in signal intensity compared with E.

 


View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5E. 45-year-old man with 2.5-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VI and hemangioma in segment V. Ferucarbotran-enhanced dynamic MR images from breath-hold in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence (200/4.2; 90° flip angle). Image obtained 20 sec after injection of contrast agent (D) shows hypointense hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow, D) and early peripheral enhancement of hemangioma (arrowhead, D). At 1 min after injection of contrast agent (E), image shows less hypointense nodule (arrow, E) than in D and subsequent filling-in of hemangioma (arrowhead, E). At 5 min after injection of contrast agent (F), image shows hyperintense hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow, F) and hemangioma (arrowhead, F). Liver shows decrease in signal intensity compared with E.

 


View larger version (100K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5F. 45-year-old man with 2.5-cm-diameter hepatocellular carcinoma in liver segment VI and hemangioma in segment V. Ferucarbotran-enhanced dynamic MR images from breath-hold in-phase T1-weighted fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence (200/4.2; 90° flip angle). Image obtained 20 sec after injection of contrast agent (D) shows hypointense hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow, D) and early peripheral enhancement of hemangioma (arrowhead, D). At 1 min after injection of contrast agent (E), image shows less hypointense nodule (arrow, E) than in D and subsequent filling-in of hemangioma (arrowhead, E). At 5 min after injection of contrast agent (F), image shows hyperintense hepatocellular carcinoma (arrow, F) and hemangioma (arrowhead, F). Liver shows decrease in signal intensity compared with E.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.