HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zheng, B. Articles by Gur, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zheng, B. Articles by Gur, D. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Performance and Reproducibility of a Computerized Mass Detection Scheme for Digitized Mammography Using Rotated and Resampled Images: An Assessment

Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket St., Ste. 4200, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3180.

View larger version (10K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1 —Effective sizes and contrast levels (in digital values) of the 44 mass regions used in this study.

View larger version (40K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2 —Comparison of repeated detections of true-positive (TP) mass regions using the three computer-aided detection schemes.

View larger version (35K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3 —Comparison of repeated detection of false-positive (FP) mass regions using the three computer-aided detection schemes.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati