AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bridges, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lightner, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bridges, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lightner, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Urethral Bulking Agents: Imaging Review

Mellena D. Bridges1, Steven P. Petrou2 and Deborah J. Lightner3

1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, 4500 San Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL 32224.
2 Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL.
3 Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.



View larger version (93K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A Series of fluoroscopic spot radiographs of pelvis obtained during course of urethral bulking procedure. Preinjection image.

 


View larger version (95K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B Series of fluoroscopic spot radiographs of pelvis obtained during course of urethral bulking procedure. Image obtained during injection shows accumulation of radiodense material (Durasphere, Carbon Medical Technologies) around lower urethra and to right of upper urethra (arrows). Notice urethral catheter with its retention balloon and opacification of bladder.

 


View larger version (82K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1C Series of fluoroscopic spot radiographs of pelvis obtained during course of urethral bulking procedure. Postprocedure image with bulking material that is now also to left of upper urethra, near bladder base. Note small foci of venous or lymphatic intravasation (arrows).

 


View larger version (89K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A Comparative CT densities of bulking agents in vitro. Scout image from CT shows three syringes containing, from left to right, new Durasphere (Carbot Medical Technologies) formulation (arrowhead), collagen (asterisk), and old Durasphere formulation (arrow).

 


View larger version (6K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B Comparative CT densities of bulking agents in vitro. Axial CT image of same three syringes using soft-tissue settings.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2C Comparative CT densities of bulking agents in vitro. Axial CT image of same three syringes using bone settings. Greater density of older Durasphere formulation is more obvious on bone window settings.

 


View larger version (105K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A CT appearance in 68-year-old woman of periurethral collagen injected approximately 6 months previously. Unenhanced axial CT image obtained during triphasic examination of abdomen and pelvis. Collagen deposits are difficult to discern.

 


View larger version (111K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B CT appearance in 68-year-old woman of periurethral collagen injected approximately 6 months previously. Avascular collagen (arrow) is more readily seen during arterial phase after administration of contrast agent as adjacent tissues begin to enhance.

 


View larger version (117K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C CT appearance in 68-year-old woman of periurethral collagen injected approximately 6 months previously. After delay of several minutes, collagen (arrow) becomes more apparent.

 


View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A Variable MRI appearance of collagen. T2-weighted image shows collection of hyperintense collagen (black arrow), which was recently injected into a tissue phantom. Compare with signal intensity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (white arrow).

 


View larger version (107K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B Variable MRI appearance of collagen. Coronal T2-weighted HASTE image in 72-year-old woman shows bulky urethra and elevated urethral neck (arrow). Here, collagen is isointense with urethral tissue.

 


View larger version (114K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4C Variable MRI appearance of collagen. Axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted image in same patient. Relative signal intensity scale has shifted so that periurethral collagen (arrows) is now hypointense to urethra.

 


View larger version (107K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5A MRI was requested to evaluate 63-year-old woman for urethral diverticulum who had history of recurrent urinary tract infections and firm urethral mass on physical examination. On postoperative histopathology, this proved to be urethral leiomyoma. Axial T2-weighted turbo spin-echo image through the level of urethra shows fairly homogeneous, isointense mass (arrow), which displaces vagina posteriorly and is indistinguishable from urethra.

 


View larger version (88K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5B MRI was requested to evaluate 63-year-old woman for urethral diverticulum who had history of recurrent urinary tract infections and firm urethral mass on physical examination. On postoperative histopathology, this proved to be urethral leiomyoma. Axial volumetric gradient-echo T1-weighted image of mass (arrow) at same level obtained immediately after IV administration of gadolinium. Faint, but unmistakable enhancement proves this is neither bulking agent nor urethral diverticulum. Compare with Figure 6D.

 


View larger version (123K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6A MRI of 74-year-old woman with history of urethral collagen injection 4 years previously for urinary incontinence. Physical examination revealed small, firm urethral mass, and MRI was requested to exclude urethral neoplasm. Axial T2-weighted turbo spin-echo image shows symmetric enlargement of urethra (arrow). Signal intensity is isointense to other perineal soft tissues, with mild heterogeneity.

 


View larger version (102K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6B MRI of 74-year-old woman with history of urethral collagen injection 4 years previously for urinary incontinence. Physical examination revealed small, firm urethral mass, and MRI was requested to exclude urethral neoplasm. Axial image at same level from fat-suppressed volumetric gradient-echo T1-weighted (VIBE) sequence shows isointense enlargement of urethra (arrow).

 


View larger version (117K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6C MRI of 74-year-old woman with history of urethral collagen injection 4 years previously for urinary incontinence. Physical examination revealed small, firm urethral mass, and MRI was requested to exclude urethral neoplasm. Coronal HASTE image shows to better advantage smooth enlargement of urethra (arrow) and its isointensity.

 


View larger version (108K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6D MRI of 74-year-old woman with history of urethral collagen injection 4 years previously for urinary incontinence. Physical examination revealed small, firm urethral mass, and MRI was requested to exclude urethral neoplasm. Gadolinium-enhanced axial VIBE image clearly shows bilateral, nonenhancing pockets of collagen flanking urethral mucosa (arrow). Note signal intensity of unenhanced images excludes possibility of urethral diverticulum, which also would fail to enhance.

 


View larger version (157K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7 Pelvic radiograph in 81-year-old woman several months after Durasphere (Carbon Medical Technologies) injection. Note very dense periurethral collections and small streaks of material in vicinity, representing intravasation (arrows).

 


View larger version (142K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8A. 43-year-old woman with severe urinary incontinence after pelvic trauma. Axial images from CT urography examination. Four Durasphere (Carbon Medical Technologies) administrations during previous year failed to relieve symptoms. Durasphere therapy represented as clump of extremely dense periurethral material. Note aliasing and beam-hardening artifact in the vicinity (arrows). Density measurements averaged 1,800 H.

 


View larger version (98K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8B. 43-year-old woman with severe urinary incontinence after pelvic trauma. Axial images from CT urography examination. Four Durasphere (Carbon Medical Technologies) administrations during previous year failed to relieve symptoms. Bone window settings provide more accurate depiction of actual extent of material.

 


View larger version (115K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8C. 43-year-old woman with severe urinary incontinence after pelvic trauma. Axial images from CT urography examination. Four Durasphere (Carbon Medical Technologies) administrations during previous year failed to relieve symptoms. Oblique coronal maximum-intensity-projection reconstruction image shows vertical extent of material and clearly shows bilateral intravasation into pelvic vessels (arrows).

 


View larger version (130K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9A MRI of pelvis of 58-year-old woman to evaluate pelvic floor dysfunction. Durasphere (Carbon Medical Technologies) injection is represented on T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) axial image by a small, extremely hypointense focus (arrow) in the muscular wall of urethra. Rectal tube (arrowhead) had been placed to facilitate injection of rectal gel.

 


View larger version (120K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9B MRI of pelvis of 58-year-old woman to evaluate pelvic floor dysfunction. Fat-suppressed T2-weighted TSE image at same level. Note how change in signal intensity range increases conspicuity of injected material (arrow).

 


View larger version (131K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9C MRI of pelvis of 58-year-old woman to evaluate pelvic floor dysfunction. Coronal single-shot T2-weighted image shows bulked-up, low-signal-intensity urethra bulging upward into bladder base (arrow).

 


View larger version (137K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10 Axial gadolinium-enhanced volumetric gradient-echo T1-weighted image in 77-year-old woman clearly shows periurethral pocket of nonenhancing microbead bulking material (arrow) adjacent to and slightly displacing urethra (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (133K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11A 54-year-old woman with stress urinary incontinence treated with periurethral injection of new Durasphere (Carbon Medical Technologies) formulation. Because of its diminished density, new agent is indiscernible on conventional pelvic radiography.

 


View larger version (133K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11B 54-year-old woman with stress urinary incontinence treated with periurethral injection of new Durasphere (Carbon Medical Technologies) formulation. Axial image from CT scan obtained same day clearly shows Durasphere (arrow) as hyperdense periurethral collection. Material extends into, or immediately adjacent to, wall of left bladder base, suggesting overzealous injection technique. Note reduced beam-hardening artifact compared with artifact in Fig. 8A.

 


View larger version (88K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11C 54-year-old woman with stress urinary incontinence treated with periurethral injection of new Durasphere (Carbon Medical Technologies) formulation. Same CT slice displayed at bone settings. Injected material (arrow) appears to be approximately same density as medullary bone. Compare with Fig. 8B.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.