AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kijowski, R.
Right arrow Articles by Buckwalter, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kijowski, R.
Right arrow Articles by Buckwalter, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2-Weighted Fast Spin-Echo Sequence and Modified STIR Sequence in the Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Tendon

Richard Kijowski1,2, Joshua M. Farber1, Jorge Medina1, William Morrison3, Jun Ying1 and Kenneth Buckwalter1

1 Department of Radiology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5253.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Clinical Science Center, E3/311, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792-3252.
3 Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107.



View larger version (121K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A 52-year-old man with right shoulder pain. Coronal oblique modified inversion recovery (A) and coronal oblique fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo (B) MR images of shoulder at same location both show fluid signal intensity within supraspinatus tendon (arrow) that appears to extend through bursal surface of tendon. All three reviewers interpreted these findings as a full-thickness tear of supraspinatus tendon.

 


View larger version (105K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B 52-year-old man with right shoulder pain. Coronal oblique modified inversion recovery (A) and coronal oblique fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo (B) MR images of shoulder at same location both show fluid signal intensity within supraspinatus tendon (arrow) that appears to extend through bursal surface of tendon. All three reviewers interpreted these findings as a full-thickness tear of supraspinatus tendon.

 


View larger version (137K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A 72-year-old man with right shoulder pain. Coronal oblique modified inversion recovery MR images of shoulder show abnormal signal intensity within supraspinatus tendon (arrow, A), primarily within articular surface of tendon. Although this abnormal signal is not as intense as fluid, there is clear disruption of fibers of supraspinatus tendon. On more anterior image (B), there appears to be disruption of bursal surface of tendon (arrow, B). All three reviewers interpreted these findings as a full-thickness tear of supraspinatus tendon.

 


View larger version (142K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B 72-year-old man with right shoulder pain. Coronal oblique modified inversion recovery MR images of shoulder show abnormal signal intensity within supraspinatus tendon (arrow, A), primarily within articular surface of tendon. Although this abnormal signal is not as intense as fluid, there is clear disruption of fibers of supraspinatus tendon. On more anterior image (B), there appears to be disruption of bursal surface of tendon (arrow, B). All three reviewers interpreted these findings as a full-thickness tear of supraspinatus tendon.

 


View larger version (168K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2C 72-year-old man with right shoulder pain. Coronal oblique fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images of shoulder in same location as A show fluid signal intensity within articular surface of tendon (arrow, C). More anterior image (D) does not clearly show disruption of bursal surface of tendon (arrow, D). All three reviewers interpreted these findings as a high-grade partial-thickness articular surface tear of supraspinatus tendon.

 


View larger version (162K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2D 72-year-old man with right shoulder pain. Coronal oblique fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images of shoulder in same location as A show fluid signal intensity within articular surface of tendon (arrow, C). More anterior image (D) does not clearly show disruption of bursal surface of tendon (arrow, D). All three reviewers interpreted these findings as a high-grade partial-thickness articular surface tear of supraspinatus tendon.

 


View larger version (165K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A 76-year-old woman with right shoulder pain. Coronal oblique modified inversion recovery MR image of shoulder shows near fluid signal intensity within anterior supraspinatus tendon (arrow) that appears to extend through bursal surface of tendon. All three reviewers interpreted these findings as a full-thickness tear of supraspinatus tendon.

 


View larger version (148K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B 76-year-old woman with right shoulder pain. Coronal oblique fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR image of shoulder at same location as A shows fluid signal intensity within anterior supraspinatus tendon (arrow) that does not appear to extend through bursal surface of tendon. Note that motion artifact is present. All three reviewers interpreted these findings as high-grade partial-thickness articular surface tear of supraspinatus tendon.

 


View larger version (105K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A 62-year-old man with right shoulder pain. Coronal oblique modified inversion recovery (A) and coronal oblique fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo (B) MR images of shoulder obtained at same location both show fluid signal intensity within articular surface of supraspinatus tendon (arrow). Signal abnormality does not appear to extend through bursal surface of tendon. All three reviewers interpreted these findings as partial-thickness articular surface tear of supraspinatus tendon.

 


View larger version (99K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B 62-year-old man with right shoulder pain. Coronal oblique modified inversion recovery (A) and coronal oblique fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo (B) MR images of shoulder obtained at same location both show fluid signal intensity within articular surface of supraspinatus tendon (arrow). Signal abnormality does not appear to extend through bursal surface of tendon. All three reviewers interpreted these findings as partial-thickness articular surface tear of supraspinatus tendon.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.