Improving Diagnostic Accuracy of MDCT Coronary Angiography in Patients with Mild Heart Rhythm Irregularities Using ECG Editing
Filippo Cademartiri1,2,
Nico R. Mollet1,2,
Giuseppe Runza1,3,
Timo Baks1,2,
Massimo Midiri3,
Eugene P. McFadden2,
Thomas G. Flohr4,
Bernd Ohnesorge4,
Pim J. de Feyter1,2 and
Gabriel P. Krestin1
1 Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein, 40,
Rotterdam 3015GD, The Netherlands.
2 Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The
Netherlands.
3 DIBIMEL, Section of Radiological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palmero,
Italy.
4 Computed Tomography, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1A Compensation of artifacts from premature beats with MDCT. Example of
data set with premature beats before (AC) and after
(DF) ECG editing obtained in 59-year-old man. ECG before editing
shows three premature beats (asterisks) in background heart rate of
approximately 45 beats per minute.
|
|

View larger version (111K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1B Compensation of artifacts from premature beats with MDCT. Example of
data set with premature beats before (AC) and after
(DF) ECG editing obtained in 59-year-old man. Data set resulting
from a reconstruction performed without editing shows motion artifacts at
level of origin of left coronary artery (arrowheads).
|
|

View larger version (101K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1C Compensation of artifacts from premature beats with MDCT. Example of
data set with premature beats before (AC) and after
(DF) ECG editing obtained in 59-year-old man. Data set resulting
from a reconstruction performed without editing shows motion artifacts at
level of origin of left coronary artery (arrowheads).
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1D Compensation of artifacts from premature beats with MDCT. Example of
data set with premature beats before (AC) and after
(DF) ECG editing obtained in 59-year-old man. After ECG editing,
artifacts are ruled out and coronary vessels are assessable. Significant
stenosis of proximal left anterior descending artery was missed before ECG
editing (B) because of artifacts, but stenosis (arrowheads,
E and F) became apparent after ECG editing.
|
|

View larger version (111K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1E Compensation of artifacts from premature beats with MDCT. Example of
data set with premature beats before (AC) and after
(DF) ECG editing obtained in 59-year-old man. After ECG editing,
artifacts are ruled out and coronary vessels are assessable. Significant
stenosis of proximal left anterior descending artery was missed before ECG
editing (B) because of artifacts, but stenosis (arrowheads,
E and F) became apparent after ECG editing.
|
|

View larger version (101K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1F Compensation of artifacts from premature beats with MDCT. Example of
data set with premature beats before (AC) and after
(DF) ECG editing obtained in 59-year-old man. After ECG editing,
artifacts are ruled out and coronary vessels are assessable. Significant
stenosis of proximal left anterior descending artery was missed before ECG
editing (B) because of artifacts, but stenosis (arrowheads,
E and F) became apparent after ECG editing.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.