Variability in Mesothelioma Tumor Response Classification
Samuel G. Armato, III1,
Joseph L. Ogarek1,
Adam Starkey1,
Nicholas J. Vogelzang2,
Hedy L. Kindler3,
Masha Kocherginsky4 and
Heber MacMahon1
1 Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave.,
Chicago, IL 60637.
2 Nevada Cancer Institute, Las Vegas, NV 89135.
3 Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
4 Department of Health Studies, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
60637.

View larger version (67K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1 Screen capture shows interface used for side-by-side comparison of
temporally sequential CT scans from 38-year-old man. Baseline scan is viewed
on left side, and follow-up scan (for which measurements were acquired for
this study) is viewed on right side. For visual approach of measurement, line
segments representing baseline scan measurements were superimposed on baseline
scan images for direct visual comparison.
|
|

View larger version (114K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2 Representative baseline CT scan section of 77-year-old man with
tumor thickness measurements acquired by initial radiologist shown as
tumorspanning line segments (white lines) superimposed for direct
visual comparison.
|
|

View larger version (110K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3A 66-year-old man. Baseline scan measurements are shown superimposed
on one section of baseline CT scans.
|
|

View larger version (113K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3B 66-year-old man. Tumor thickness measurements acquired by observer
on corresponding follow-up scan section (as selected by that observer) based
on written report of baseline scan measurements (black line segments) and with
benefit of visual aid (white line segments). Baseline measurements were not
superimposed during implementation of written-report approach.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.