AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadley, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadley, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Potential Impact of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria on CT for Trauma

Johnathan L. Hadley1, John Agola1 and Ping Wong1,2

1 Department of Radiology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 4720 Brompton Dr., Virginia Beach, VA 23456.
2 Present address: Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Comprehensive Cancer Center, 325 W 15th St., New York, NY 10011.


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 —Bar graph shows total number of patients distributed by mechanism of injury. MVC = motor vehicle collision, GSW = gunshot wound, PED = pedestrian struck by car, UNK = unknown mechanism.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 —Bar graph shows distribution of imaging of head, cervical spine (c-spine), abdomen, and pelvis in patients with major injuries (dark bars) undergoing CT versus patients with minor or no injures (light bars) at imaging. Similar imaging utilization patterns were found in each of these subgroups.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 —Bar graph shows cost of imaging patients with major injuries versus patients without major injuries. "Potential cost savings" reflects potential amount saved if American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria had been applied to CT selection. Cost reflects charges incurred by uninsured individuals who were responsible for full health care bill.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.