AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rhim, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rhim, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Effect of Histologic Grade on Therapeutic Results

Seong Hyun Kim1, Hyo K. Lim1, Dongil Choi1, Won Jae Lee1, Seung Hoon Kim1, Min Ju Kim1, Chan Kyo Kim1, Yong Hwan Jeon1, Jong Mee Lee1 and Hyunchul Rhim1

1 All authors: Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul 135-710, South Korea.


Figure 1
View larger version (113K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1A —54-year-old man with Edmondson-Steiner grade I hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained during arterial phase before radiofrequency ablation shows 2.7-cm HCC (arrows) in liver segment VI.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1B —54-year-old man with Edmondson-Steiner grade I hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained during arterial phase 5 months after radiofrequency ablation shows no evidence of local tumor progression in radiofrequency ablation zone (arrows), with atrophy of hepatic parenchyma distal to ablation zone.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (101K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1C —54-year-old man with Edmondson-Steiner grade I hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained during arterial phase 7 months after radiofrequency ablation shows local tumor progression (arrows) in peripheral margin of radiofrequency ablation zone (asterisk).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2A —46-year-old-woman with Edmondson-Steiner grade II hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had delayed local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained during arterial phase 3 months after radiofrequency ablation for 2.5-cm HCC in liver segment VII shows radiofrequency ablation zone (arrows) with no local tumor progression.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (115K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2B —46-year-old-woman with Edmondson-Steiner grade II hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had delayed local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained during arterial phase 19 months after radiofrequency ablation shows decrease in size of radiofrequency ablation zone (arrows) with no local tumor progression.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (116K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2C —46-year-old-woman with Edmondson-Steiner grade II hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had delayed local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained during arterial phase 26 months after radiofrequency ablation shows local tumor progression (arrow) in margin of radiofrequency ablation zone (asterisk).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (98K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3A —45-year-old-man with Edmondson-Steiner grade III hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had delayed local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained during arterial phase before radiofrequency ablation shows 3.2-cm HCC tumor (arrows) in liver segment II.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (91K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3B —45-year-old-man with Edmondson-Steiner grade III hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had delayed local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained during arterial phase 23 months after radiofrequency ablation shows small, enhancing nodule (arrow) in margin of radiofrequency ablation zone (asterisk), with substantial decrease in size of zone.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (107K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3C —45-year-old-man with Edmondson-Steiner grade III hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had delayed local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained during arterial phase 26 months after radiofrequency ablation shows growth of enhancing nodule (arrow) and new enhancing nodule (arrowhead) in margin of radiofrequency ablation zone (asterisk).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4 —Curves indicate cumulative survival in three groups with different histologic grades after radiofrequency ablation. Cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 97%, 79%, and 71%, respectively, for group 1; 92%, 56%, and 44%, respectively, for group 2; and 100%, 57%, and 43%, respectively, for group 3. Three- and 5-year cumulative survival rates in group 1 were higher than those of groups with higher histologic grades, but no statistically significant difference was found for cumulative survival rates between groups (p > 0.05). Number of patients followed up at 1, 3, and 5 years was 35, 14, and one, respectively, in group 1; 46, 23, and seven, respectively, in group 2; and seven, four, and two, respectively in group 3.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5 —Curves indicate cancer-free survival in three groups with different histologic grades after radiofrequency ablation. Cancer-free survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 74%, 44%, 39%, and 39%, respectively, for group 1; 53%, 23%, 13%, and 10%, respectively, for group 2; and 57%, 29%, 14%, and 0%, respectively, for group 3. Four-year cancer-free survival rate showed a trend to decrease with increasing histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (p < 0.05 for groups 1 vs 2; p > 0.05 for groups 1 vs 3 and groups 2 vs 3 by Bonferroni correction). Number of patients followed up at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 25, 10, four, and two, respectively, in group 1; 24, seven, four, and two, respectively, in group 2; and four, two, one, and one, respectively, in group 3.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.