AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elicker, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weinreb, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elicker, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weinreb, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

IV Contrast Administration for CT: A Survey of Practices for the Screening and Prevention of Contrast Nephropathy

Brett M. Elicker1, Yasmin S. Cypel2,3 and Jeffrey C. Weinreb4

1 Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Rm. M-391, San Francisco, CA 94143.
2 Research Department, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA.
4 Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1 —Practice environment of those who responded to survey. Numbers are expressed in percentage of respondents choosing particular environment.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2 —Specialty of those who responded to survey. Numbers are expressed in percentage of respondents choosing particular specialty.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3 —Frequency with which respondents administer iodinated IV contrast material to patients with renal transplant. Numbers are expressed in percentage of respondents who chose particular frequency.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4 —Frequency with which respondents administer iodinated IV contrast material to patients with multiple myeloma. Numbers are expressed in percentage of respondents who chose particular frequency.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.