AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kang, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kang, H. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Reliability Analysis of 16-MDCT in Preoperative Evaluation of Total Knee Arthroplasty and Comparison With Intraoperative Measurements

In Sook Lee1,2,3, Jung-Ah Choi1,2, Tae Kyun Kim4, Ilkyu Han4, Joon Woo Lee1,2 and Heung Sik Kang1,2

1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeongi-do 463-707, Korea.
2 Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea.


Figure 1
View larger version (64K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1A —Methods of femoral sizing on a CT workstation. All measurements were done using multiplanar reconstruction and 3D volume-rendered images. Dot cursors for measuring on 3D volume-rendered image were placed in identical portions on corresponding axial, coronal, and sagittal images. Transepicondylar distance was measured as distance between most medial and most lateral prominences of epicondyles.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1B —Methods of femoral sizing on a CT workstation. All measurements were done using multiplanar reconstruction and 3D volume-rendered images. Dot cursors for measuring on 3D volume-rendered image were placed in identical portions on corresponding axial, coronal, and sagittal images. Maximum anteroposterior dimension of medial femoral condyle was measured at most anterior and most posterior projections.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1C —Methods of femoral sizing on a CT workstation. All measurements were done using multiplanar reconstruction and 3D volume-rendered images. Dot cursors for measuring on 3D volume-rendered image were placed in identical portions on corresponding axial, coronal, and sagittal images. Maximum anteroposterior dimension of lateral femoral condyle was measured at most anterior and most posterior projections.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1D —Methods of femoral sizing on a CT workstation. All measurements were done using multiplanar reconstruction and 3D volume-rendered images. Dot cursors for measuring on 3D volume-rendered image were placed in identical portions on corresponding axial, coronal, and sagittal images. Trochlear width was determined as distance between most anterior projections of medial and lateral condyles.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.