Breast MRI Using the VIBE Sequence: Clustered Ring Enhancement in the Differential Diagnosis of Lesions Showing Non-Masslike Enhancement
Mitsuhiro Tozaki1,2,
Takao Igarashi2 and
Kunihiko Fukuda2
1 Present address: Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Breast Center, Kameda Medical
Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan 296-8602.
2 Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8
Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan 105-8461.

View larger version (73K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1A 54-year-old woman with suspicious microcalcifications on
mammography. Coronal first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image of left
breast shows regional enhancement in upper outer quadrant (arrow).
Lesion indicates heterogeneous enhancement inside of which minute ring
enhancements are seen clustered (clustered ring enhancement).
|
|

View larger version (147K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1B 54-year-old woman with suspicious microcalcifications on
mammography. Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen shows ductal
carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with intraluminal necrosis and microcalcifications.
Clustered ring enhancement corresponds to periductal stroma. However,
intraductal cancer cell involvement in enhancement cannot be ruled out.
|
|

View larger version (76K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2A 48-year-old woman who presented with bloody nipple discharge
of left breast. No microcalcifications were detectable on mammography. Coronal
first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows segmental heterogeneous
enhancement in lower region of left breast (arrow).
|
|

View larger version (78K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2B 48-year-old woman who presented with bloody nipple discharge
of left breast. No microcalcifications were detectable on mammography.
Transverse third contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows clustered ring
enhancement (arrow).
|
|

View larger version (157K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2C 48-year-old woman who presented with bloody nipple discharge
of left breast. No microcalcifications were detectable on mammography.
Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen shows ductal carcinoma in situ
(DCIS) with micropapillary pattern. Clustered ring enhancement corresponds to
periductal stroma.
|
|

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3A 42-year-old woman with suspicious density on mammography.
Sagittal multiplanar reconstruction of first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR
image shows focal enhancement in upper region of left breast
(arrow).
|
|

View larger version (59K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3B 42-year-old woman with suspicious density on mammography.
Transverse multiplanar reconstruction of first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted
MR image shows nonenhancing internal septations (arrow).
|
|

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3C 42-year-old woman with suspicious density on mammography.
Transverse third contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows heterogeneous
internal enhancement with clustered ring enhancement (arrows).
Histologic evaluation of lumpectomy specimen revealed 20-mm ductal carcinoma
in situ (DCIS) within 5-mm invasive ductal carcinoma. Nonenhancing internal
septations corresponded to normal gland tissue.
|
|

View larger version (111K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4A 38-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography.
Coronal first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image of right breast shows
focal enhancement in upper outer quadrant (arrow).
|
|

View larger version (112K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4B 38-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography.
Coronal first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image of right breast shows
clustered ring enhancement (arrow).
|
|

View larger version (131K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4C 38-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography.
Coronal third contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows persistent pattern
(arrow). Lesion shows aggregate of enhancing foci in cobblestone
pattern (clumped enhancement), and enhancing foci constitute ringlike
enhancement pattern. This type of clustered ring enhancement is thought to be
subtype of clumped enhancement. Histologic evaluation of excisional biopsy
specimen revealed fibrocystic disease. Clustered ring enhancement corresponded
to dilated ducts within microcalcifications.
|
|

View larger version (75K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5A 43-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography.
Coronal first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image of right breast shows
regional heterogeneous enhancement (arrows).
|
|

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5B 43-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography.
Transverse multiplanar reconstruction of first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted
MR image shows regional heterogeneous enhancement without clustered ring
enhancement (arrows).
|
|

View larger version (72K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5C 43-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography.
Transverse third contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows persistent
enhancing region without clustered ring enhancement (arrows).
Histologic evaluation of excisional biopsy specimen revealed fibrocystic
disease.
|
|

View larger version (68K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6A 40-year-old woman who presented with bloody nipple discharge
of left breast. No microcalcifications were detectable on mammography.
Transverse multiplanar reconstruction of first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted
MR image shows segmental enhancement with clumped internal architecture
(arrows).
|
|

View larger version (67K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6B 40-year-old woman who presented with bloody nipple discharge
of left breast. No microcalcifications were detectable on mammography.
Transverse third contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows clustered ring
enhancement after washout (arrows). This type of clustered ring
enhancement is thought to be subtype of clumped enhancement. Histologic
evaluation of mastectomy specimen revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
One physiopathologic explanation is that intraductal carcinoma with abundant
blood supply exhibits washout pattern and contrast medium that accumulates in
periductal stroma or ductal wall contributes to this phenomenon.
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.