AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tozaki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tozaki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Breast MRI Using the VIBE Sequence: Clustered Ring Enhancement in the Differential Diagnosis of Lesions Showing Non-Masslike Enhancement

Mitsuhiro Tozaki1,2, Takao Igarashi2 and Kunihiko Fukuda2

1 Present address: Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Breast Center, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan 296-8602.
2 Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan 105-8461.


Figure 1
View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A 54-year-old woman with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Coronal first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image of left breast shows regional enhancement in upper outer quadrant (arrow). Lesion indicates heterogeneous enhancement inside of which minute ring enhancements are seen clustered (clustered ring enhancement).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (147K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B 54-year-old woman with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen shows ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with intraluminal necrosis and microcalcifications. Clustered ring enhancement corresponds to periductal stroma. However, intraductal cancer cell involvement in enhancement cannot be ruled out.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A 48-year-old woman who presented with bloody nipple discharge of left breast. No microcalcifications were detectable on mammography. Coronal first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows segmental heterogeneous enhancement in lower region of left breast (arrow).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (78K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B 48-year-old woman who presented with bloody nipple discharge of left breast. No microcalcifications were detectable on mammography. Transverse third contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows clustered ring enhancement (arrow).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (157K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2C 48-year-old woman who presented with bloody nipple discharge of left breast. No microcalcifications were detectable on mammography. Photomicrograph of histopathologic specimen shows ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with micropapillary pattern. Clustered ring enhancement corresponds to periductal stroma.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (64K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A 42-year-old woman with suspicious density on mammography. Sagittal multiplanar reconstruction of first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows focal enhancement in upper region of left breast (arrow).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B 42-year-old woman with suspicious density on mammography. Transverse multiplanar reconstruction of first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows nonenhancing internal septations (arrow).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3C 42-year-old woman with suspicious density on mammography. Transverse third contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows heterogeneous internal enhancement with clustered ring enhancement (arrows). Histologic evaluation of lumpectomy specimen revealed 20-mm ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) within 5-mm invasive ductal carcinoma. Nonenhancing internal septations corresponded to normal gland tissue.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (111K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4A 38-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography. Coronal first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image of right breast shows focal enhancement in upper outer quadrant (arrow).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (112K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4B 38-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography. Coronal first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image of right breast shows clustered ring enhancement (arrow).

 

Figure 11
View larger version (131K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4C 38-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography. Coronal third contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows persistent pattern (arrow). Lesion shows aggregate of enhancing foci in cobblestone pattern (clumped enhancement), and enhancing foci constitute ringlike enhancement pattern. This type of clustered ring enhancement is thought to be subtype of clumped enhancement. Histologic evaluation of excisional biopsy specimen revealed fibrocystic disease. Clustered ring enhancement corresponded to dilated ducts within microcalcifications.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5A 43-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography. Coronal first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image of right breast shows regional heterogeneous enhancement (arrows).

 

Figure 13
View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5B 43-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography. Transverse multiplanar reconstruction of first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows regional heterogeneous enhancement without clustered ring enhancement (arrows).

 

Figure 14
View larger version (72K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5C 43-year-old woman with microcalcifications on mammography. Transverse third contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows persistent enhancing region without clustered ring enhancement (arrows). Histologic evaluation of excisional biopsy specimen revealed fibrocystic disease.

 

Figure 15
View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6A 40-year-old woman who presented with bloody nipple discharge of left breast. No microcalcifications were detectable on mammography. Transverse multiplanar reconstruction of first contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows segmental enhancement with clumped internal architecture (arrows).

 

Figure 16
View larger version (67K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6B 40-year-old woman who presented with bloody nipple discharge of left breast. No microcalcifications were detectable on mammography. Transverse third contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows clustered ring enhancement after washout (arrows). This type of clustered ring enhancement is thought to be subtype of clumped enhancement. Histologic evaluation of mastectomy specimen revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). One physiopathologic explanation is that intraductal carcinoma with abundant blood supply exhibits washout pattern and contrast medium that accumulates in periductal stroma or ductal wall contributes to this phenomenon.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.