HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mascalchi, M. Articles by Paci, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mascalchi, M. Articles by Paci, E. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Risk-Benefit Analysis of X-Ray Exposure Associated with Lung Cancer Screening in the Italung-CT Trial

¹ Sezione di Radiodiagnostica, Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Clinica, Università di Firenze, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134 Firenze, Italia.
² Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Firenze, Italia.
³ Centro di Studio e Prevenzione Oncologica, Firenze, Italia.
⁴ U.O. Radiologia Diagnostica, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Firenze, Italia.
⁵ U.O. Pneumologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Firenze, Italia.

View larger version (16K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1A —Risk-to-benefit ratios for study participants. Risk-to-benefit ratio (log units) histograms for male (A) and female (B) never-smokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers associated with four annual screening examinations with MDCT (MD) and single-detector (SD) (low-dose thick-collimation plus one full-dose thin-collimation package) scanners in the Italung-CT Trial. Three different levels of expected benefit—namely, 10%, 20%, and 30% reduction of lung cancer mortality—are considered. Assuming 10% reduction of mortality, risk-benefit ratio is over the unit—that is, the number of radiation-induced deaths overcomes the estimated number of lives saved, for male (1.13) and female (1.66) never-smokers examined with the single-detector scanner. At the same level of screening efficacy, the ratio is between 1 and 0.1 and close to the critic value of 0.5, implying only two lives saved for one radiation-induced death, for male (0.53) or female (0.78) never-smokers examined with an MDCT scanner, for female former smokers examined with a single-detector (0.87) or MDCT (0.41) scanner, and for male former smokers examined with a single-detector scanner (0.53). Assuming 20% or 30% screening efficacy, the ratio is around or below 0.1 for male and female current smokers examined with either a single-detector or MDCT scanner.

View larger version (15K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1B —Risk-to-benefit ratios for study participants. Risk-to-benefit ratio (log units) histograms for male (A) and female (B) never-smokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers associated with four annual screening examinations with MDCT (MD) and single-detector (SD) (low-dose thick-collimation plus one full-dose thin-collimation package) scanners in the Italung-CT Trial. Three different levels of expected benefit—namely, 10%, 20%, and 30% reduction of lung cancer mortality—are considered. Assuming 10% reduction of mortality, risk-benefit ratio is over the unit—that is, the number of radiation-induced deaths overcomes the estimated number of lives saved, for male (1.13) and female (1.66) never-smokers examined with the single-detector scanner. At the same level of screening efficacy, the ratio is between 1 and 0.1 and close to the critic value of 0.5, implying only two lives saved for one radiation-induced death, for male (0.53) or female (0.78) never-smokers examined with an MDCT scanner, for female former smokers examined with a single-detector (0.87) or MDCT (0.41) scanner, and for male former smokers examined with a single-detector scanner (0.53). Assuming 20% or 30% screening efficacy, the ratio is around or below 0.1 for male and female current smokers examined with either a single-detector or MDCT scanner.

View larger version (15K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2A —Risk-to-benefit histograms for men and women stratified by age. Risk-to-benefit ratio (log units) histograms for males (A) and females (B) commencing 4 years of annual screening rounds on an MDCT (MD) or single-detector (SD) (low-dose thick-collimation plus one full-dose thin-collimation package) scanner in different age categories: 55-59, 60-64, and 65-69 years. Efficacy of screening is assumed to be 20% in reducing mortality in 8 years after start of program. For current smokers, risk-benefit ratio ranges between 0.21 in women who are 55-59 years old examined on a single-detector scanner and 0.008 in men who are 65-69 years old examined on an MDCT scanner.

View larger version (13K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2B —Risk-to-benefit histograms for men and women stratified by age. Risk-to-benefit ratio (log units) histograms for males (A) and females (B) commencing 4 years of annual screening rounds on an MDCT (MD) or single-detector (SD) (low-dose thick-collimation plus one full-dose thin-collimation package) scanner in different age categories: 55-59, 60-64, and 65-69 years. Efficacy of screening is assumed to be 20% in reducing mortality in 8 years after start of program. For current smokers, risk-benefit ratio ranges between 0.21 in women who are 55-59 years old examined on a single-detector scanner and 0.008 in men who are 65-69 years old examined on an MDCT scanner.

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati