The Effect of Patient Age on Contrast Enhancement During CT of the Pancreatobiliary Region
Shigeki Itoh1,
Mitsuru Ikeda1,
Hiroko Satake2,
Toyohiro Ota2 and
Takeo Ishigaki2
1 Department of Technical Radiology, Nagoya University School of Health
Sciences, Daikou-minami 1-1-20, Higashi-ku, Nagoya 461-8673, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya
466-8550, Japan.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1A Visual grades for pancreatic phase images. All images are
displayed at window width of 345 H and window level of 45 H. 63-year-old man
with bile duct carcinoma. Contrast enhancement of pancreatic parenchyma is too
intense to be evaluated in detail at these settings.
|
|

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1B Visual grades for pancreatic phase images. All images are
displayed at window width of 345 H and window level of 45 H. 65-year-old man
with gallbladder carcinoma. Visual grade was excellent (contrast enhancement
provided optimal information for making radiologic diagnosis).
|
|

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1C Visual grades for pancreatic phase images. All images are
displayed at window width of 345 H and window level of 45 H. 60-year-old man
with adenomyomatosis of gallbladder. Visual grade was good (contrast
enhancement provided adequate information for making a radiologic
diagnosis).
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2 Histogram for time of start of arterial phase scanning in
groups 2 (black bars) and 3 (gray bars).
|
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.