AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ha, H. I.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ha, H. I.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Effects of High-Resolution CT of the Lung Using Partial Versus Full Reconstruction on Motion Artifacts and Image Noise

Hong Il Ha1, Hyun Woo Goo1, Joon Beom Seo1, Jae-Woo Song1 and Jin Seong Lee1

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Poongnap-2 dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, South Korea 138-736.


Figure 1
View larger version (81K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 34-year-old man with benign pulmonary nodule. High-resolution CT image of left lung exemplifies measurement of maximum width (arrows) of cardiac motion artifact and area percentage of motion artifacts in left lung. Artifact area (dotted line) in left lung was bordered by outermost points of paracardiac area showing cardiac motion artifacts, and its percentage to whole area of left lung at scanned level was calculated.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Visual grading of cardiac motion artifacts in cardiac border, bronchi, vessels, and fissure on 0.3-second (gray bars) and 0.75-second (black bars) high-resolution CT (HRCT) images. Difference in visual grade for each anatomic structure between 0.3-second and 0.75-second HRCT images was significant (p < 0.001). Difference in total visual grade of all evaluated anatomic structures between 0.3-second images (15.4 ± 1.2) and 0.75-second images (7.6 ± 2.5) was significant (p < 0.001).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (94K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3A 76-year-old man with lung cancer. 0.3-second high-resolution CT image reveals no cardiac motion artifacts in left lung and increased noise because of increased temporal resolution.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (96K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3B 76-year-old man with lung cancer. 0.75-second high-resolution CT image shows motion artifacts along cardiac border (> 4 mm in maximum width) and doubling (arrows) of larger bronchi, larger vessels, and fissure.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Maximum width of cardiac motion artifact along left cardiac border in 0.3-second and 0.75-second high-resolution CT (HRCT) images. Difference between 0.3-second images (0.1 ± 0.5 mm) and 0.75-second images (4.5 ± 1.7 mm) was significant (p < 0.001).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 Area percentage of motion artifact in left lung in 0.3-second and 0.75-second high-resolution CT (HRCT) images. Difference between 0.3-second images (6.7% ± 18.4%) and 0.75-second images (36.2% ± 20.9%) was significant (p < 0.001).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6 Image noises (standard deviation of CT densitometry) in air and lung in 0.3-second (gray bars) and 0.75-second (black bars) high-resolution CT (HRCT) images. Image noises in air (38.0 ± 9.2) and lung parenchyma (86.0 ± 23.1) for 0.3-second HRCT images were greater than those on 0.75-second images (35.6 ± 9.6 and 76.0 ± 20.3, respectively) (p < 0.01).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.