AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houck, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Houck, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Live 3D Echocardiography: A Replacement for Traditional 2D Echocardiography?

Robin C. Houck1,2, Jason E. Cooke1,3 and Edward A. Gill1

1 Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Box 359748, 329 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA 98104-2599.
2 Present address: Medicine Department, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
3 Present address: Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN.


Figure 1
View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Diagram shows relationship of transesophageal echocardiography probe to heart in example of use of rotational sweep to acquire 2D images for a 3D data set. (Courtesy of Philips Medical Systems [Andover, MA and Bothell, WA] and TomTec Imaging Systems GmbH [Munich, Germany])

 

Figure 2
View larger version (167K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Mechanical arm, first described by Dekker et al. [1] in 1974, is shown. Transducer (arrow) is held on mechanical arm. Location of transducer is known because it is attached to mechanical arm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (104K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Photograph shows device attached to transducer that emitted sound. See Past Techniques section for further discussion.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Diagram illustrates freehand technique. Transducer is tracked via a magnetic field created by magnet enclosed within cube. See Past Techniques section for further discussion. (Courtesy of TomTec Imaging Systems GmbH, Munich, Germany)

 

Figure 5
View larger version (84K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 Rotational device designed to hold a transducer is shown. Transducer, an older mechanical type, is shown protruding from bottom of rotator (arrow). (Courtesy of TomTec Imaging Systems GmbH, Munich, Germany)

 

Figure 6
View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6A Techniques used for 3D image acquisition protocols. Diagrams show fanning (A) and linear or stepper (B) motor devices used for transthoracic 3D image acquisition protocol. Fanning device follows fan motion, and linear device, by definition, follows linear tracking protocol. (Courtesy of TomTec Imaging Systems GmbH, Munich, Germany)

 

Figure 7
View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6B Techniques used for 3D image acquisition protocols. Diagrams show fanning (A) and linear or stepper (B) motor devices used for transthoracic 3D image acquisition protocol. Fanning device follows fan motion, and linear device, by definition, follows linear tracking protocol. (Courtesy of TomTec Imaging Systems GmbH, Munich, Germany)

 

Figure 8
View larger version (139K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7 Photograph shows transducer designed with rotation capabilities contained within housing. End result is similar to Figure 5, but rather than having a separate device to hold transducer, transducer itself has electronic steering that steers in rotational pattern. Design is also similar to transesophageal echocardiography transducer shown in Figure 1. (Courtesy of Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA and Bothell, WA)

 

Figure 9
View larger version (107K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8A Three-dimensional images obtained using rotational transesophageal echocardiography acquisition and subsequent reconstruction. All are designed to show benefits of en face view of entire structure with depth as opposed to 2D image showing only single cut. Three-dimensional image of stenotic mitral valve (arrows, A) from left ventricular side of valve (A) and corresponding 2D cut (B) are shown.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8B Three-dimensional images obtained using rotational transesophageal echocardiography acquisition and subsequent reconstruction. All are designed to show benefits of en face view of entire structure with depth as opposed to 2D image showing only single cut. Three-dimensional image of stenotic mitral valve (arrows, A) from left ventricular side of valve (A) and corresponding 2D cut (B) are shown.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8C Three-dimensional images obtained using rotational transesophageal echocardiography acquisition and subsequent reconstruction. All are designed to show benefits of en face view of entire structure with depth as opposed to 2D image showing only single cut. Atrial septal defect—ASD in C and arrow in D—is shown on 3D image (C) in its entirety as opposed to corresponding 2D cut (D). In C, AoV refers to aortic valve.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8D Three-dimensional images obtained using rotational transesophageal echocardiography acquisition and subsequent reconstruction. All are designed to show benefits of en face view of entire structure with depth as opposed to 2D image showing only single cut. Atrial septal defect—ASD in C and arrow in D—is shown on 3D image (C) in its entirety as opposed to corresponding 2D cut (D). In C, AoV refers to aortic valve.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (130K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8E Three-dimensional images obtained using rotational transesophageal echocardiography acquisition and subsequent reconstruction. All are designed to show benefits of en face view of entire structure with depth as opposed to 2D image showing only single cut. Three-dimensional image shows aortic valve (arrow) with focal sclerosis of commissure between the non and right coronary cusp.

 

Figure 14
View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8F Three-dimensional images obtained using rotational transesophageal echocardiography acquisition and subsequent reconstruction. All are designed to show benefits of en face view of entire structure with depth as opposed to 2D image showing only single cut. Two-dimensional image shows flail posterior mitral valve leaflet (arrow).

 

Figure 15
View larger version (137K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8G Three-dimensional images obtained using rotational transesophageal echocardiography acquisition and subsequent reconstruction. All are designed to show benefits of en face view of entire structure with depth as opposed to 2D image showing only single cut. Three-dimensional image of mitral valve in systole shows middle scallop of posterior leaflet.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9 Diagram illustrates real-time 3D transthoracic echocardiography probe with sparse array design. Note comparison with dense array shown in Figures 11A and 11B. See First-Rendition of Real-Time 3D Imaging section for discussion. (Courtesy of Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA and Bothell, WA)

 

Figure 17
View larger version (93K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10 Standard 2D echocardiography images of left ventricle (right) and corresponding cross-sectional views (left), or C scans. Four-chamber (top) and two-chamber (bottom) views are shown. This figure is from older version of real-time 3D imaging. (Courtesy of D. Adams, Durham, NC)

 

Figure 18
View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11A Images show schematic and photograph of dense array real-time 3D transducer. (Courtesy of Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA and Bothell, WA) Schematic representation of dense array real-time 3D transducer. Each square represents an element. See First-Rendition of Real-Time 3D Imaging section for discussion.

 

Figure 19
View larger version (67K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11B Images show schematic and photograph of dense array real-time 3D transducer. (Courtesy of Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA and Bothell, WA) Photograph shows live 3D matrix transducer (Matrix X4) manufactured by Philips Medical Systems.

 

Figure 20
View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12 Diagram depicts transition from one-dimensional (1D) to 3D data set. Note single scan line from single crystal 1D or A-mode scan transitioning to axial and lateral imaging with 2D phased-array scanning and to axial, lateral, and elevation scanning with 3D matrix scanning. See further discussion in Live 3D Imaging section. C scan is essentially an axial cut through 3D data set. (Illustration by Richard Gersony)

 

Figure 21
View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 13 Progression from 2D imaging to 3D narrow-angle (NA) to 3D full-volume (FV) imaging is shown with respective representative images. In 2D imaging, only single slice of data is acquired with result being 2D image with no depth. In 3D narrow-angle imaging, entire heart volume is not obtained; rather, 3D slice of varying width, depending on resolution, is obtained and simultaneous volume rendering adds depth not seen with 2D slice. Finally, for 3D full-volume imaging, example shows that although entire volume of heart is captured, exact same volume-rendered slice shown in 3D narrow-angle imaging can be extracted from larger volume data set resulting in identical image. (Illustration by Richard Gersony)

 

Figure 22
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 14A Diagrams show concept of full-volume versus narrow-angle imaging compared with 2D imaging. Note lack of elevation steering for 2D imaging and that larger volume data set is acquired for full-volume imaging. (Illustration by Richard Gersony)

 

Figure 23
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 14B Diagrams show concept of full-volume versus narrow-angle imaging compared with 2D imaging. Concept of acquisition of full volume is shown. Full volume is acquired from total of four cardiac cycles. Each individual cardiac cycle contributes one fourth of thickness of entire data set as illustrated with individual colors. Cardiac gating is required to meld four cardiac cycles into one. (Illustration by Richard Gersony)

 

Figure 24
View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 14C Diagrams show concept of full-volume versus narrow-angle imaging compared with 2D imaging. When more than one cardiac cycle is used, it becomes important to match individual frames within a cardiac cycle. As illustrated, when one cardiac cycle is acquired, each cardiac cycle is divided into multiple frames; total of 11 frames are shown in this example. Number of frames used for each acquisition depends on heart rate (R-R interval) as well as frame rate of acquisition machine. It is desirable (but not always possible) to have same R-R interval for each cardiac cycle so that each frame can be matched. (Courtesy of TomTec Imaging Systems GmbH, Munich, Germany)

 

Figure 25
View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 15 Narrow-angle versus full-volume imaging is shown as well as different levels of resolution possible (high, medium, low). In this particular algorithm for 3D imaging, choice was made to keep number of scan lines; hence, volume rate is constant and results in change in resolution from narrow angle to full volume. See Full-Volume Versus Narrow-Angle Acquisition section for further discussion regarding resolution and zoom. (Illustration by Richard Gersony)

 

Figure 26
View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 16 Versatility of 3D data set is shown with three consecutive cropping planes (lateral, elevation, and azimuthal [axial]), each perpendicular to other, used to create 3D images that are perpendicular to one another. Three-dimensional rendering can be performed in any direction perpendicular to reference plane. Note that final image (drawing E) represents equivalent of C scan with cutting plane being perpendicular to axial plane or depth of ultrasound beam. (Illustration by Richard Gersony)

 

Figure 27
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 17A Graphs show correlation and degree of agreement between 2D echocardiography and 3D echocardiography compared with currently perceived gold standard of cardiac MRI. Note considerable improvement in both correlation and agreement to MRI provided by live 3D imaging compared with 2D imaging. (Reprinted with permission from Circulation [47]). Graphs show correlation and degree of agreement between 2D echocardiography and live 3D echocardiography (A) and between each echocardiography technique and cardiac MRI (B) for determining left ventricular (LV) mass.

 

Figure 28
View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 17B Graphs show correlation and degree of agreement between 2D echocardiography and 3D echocardiography compared with currently perceived gold standard of cardiac MRI. Note considerable improvement in both correlation and agreement to MRI provided by live 3D imaging compared with 2D imaging. (Reprinted with permission from Circulation [47]). Graphs show correlation and degree of agreement between 2D echocardiography and live 3D echocardiography (A) and between each echocardiography technique and cardiac MRI (B) for determining left ventricular (LV) mass.

 

Figure 29
View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 18A Live 3D imaging examples of how 3D imaging is better than 2D imaging for evaluating structures such as septal defects. Atrial septal defect (ASD) occluder device (Amplatz Occluder Device, AGA Medical Corporation) is shown on 3D imaging. Note ability to see device en face in B after tilting image shown in A. In B, AoV indicates aortic valve.

 

Figure 30
View larger version (68K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 18B Live 3D imaging examples of how 3D imaging is better than 2D imaging for evaluating structures such as septal defects. Atrial septal defect (ASD) occluder device (Amplatz Occluder Device, AGA Medical Corporation) is shown on 3D imaging. Note ability to see device en face in B after tilting image shown in A. In B, AoV indicates aortic valve.

 

Figure 31
View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 19A Live 3D transthoracic view of mitral valve repair. Images show annuloplasty ring from parasternal long view (A) and apical view (B). Arrows point to left atrium (LA, A).

 

Figure 32
View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 19B Live 3D transthoracic view of mitral valve repair. Images show annuloplasty ring from parasternal long view (A) and apical view (B). Arrows point to left atrium (LA, A).

 

Figure 33
View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 19C Live 3D transthoracic view of mitral valve repair. Images show mitral valve and annuloplasty ring with view from left atrial side of valve during systole (C) and diastole (D). These images were obtained via reconstructive transesophageal echocardiography technology. Arrows depict central orifice (thick arrow) and incoming pulmonary veins (thin arrow) on periphery.

 

Figure 34
View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 19D Live 3D transthoracic view of mitral valve repair. Images show mitral valve and annuloplasty ring with view from left atrial side of valve during systole (C) and diastole (D). These images were obtained via reconstructive transesophageal echocardiography technology. Arrows depict central orifice (thick arrow) and incoming pulmonary veins (thin arrow) on periphery.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.