AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Shiina, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Shiina, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Placement of a Long Tapered Side-Hole Catheter in the Hepatic Artery: Technical Advantages, Catheter Stability, and Arterial Patency

Hiroshi Seki1 and Makoto Shiina1

1 Both authors: Department of Radiology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, 2-15-3, Kawagishi-cho, Niigata 951-8566, Japan.


Figure 1
View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1A 60-year-old man with liver metastases from sigmoid colon cancer. Celiac arteriogram obtained before catheter placement shows right gastric artery (arrows) and accessory left gastric artery (arrowheads) arising from proper hepatic artery.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1B 60-year-old man with liver metastases from sigmoid colon cancer. Abdominal radiograph obtained just after catheter placement shows 2.7-French distal shaft of catheter in celiac artery and 5-French proximal shaft in aorta. Catheter tip is advanced distally into right hepatic artery and side hole of distal shaft is located in proper hepatic artery (arrow).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (100K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1C 60-year-old man with liver metastases from sigmoid colon cancer. Arteriogram using catheter-port system obtained just after implantation shows no extrahepatic perfusion and no embolization of gastroduodenal artery, and occlusion of right gastric artery (arrow) and accessory left gastric artery (arrowhead) using coils.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2A 61-year-old woman with liver metastases from rectal cancer who previously underwent left hepatic lobectomy. Arteriogram obtained before catheter placement shows replaced right hepatic artery arising from superior mesenteric artery.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (107K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2B 61-year-old woman with liver metastases from rectal cancer who previously underwent left hepatic lobectomy. Arteriogram using catheter-port system was obtained just after implantation. Long tapered side-hole catheter was inserted into replaced right hepatic artery. Arterial branch of caudate lobe of liver arising from proper hepatic artery was occluded using coils (arrow).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Graph shows Kaplan-Meier analysis for cumulative stability of catheter according to catheter placement method. {blacktriangleup} = long tapered catheter placement method, censored cases; {circ} = conventional method, censored cases; X = fixed-catheter-tip method, censored cases. Stability rates in patients treated with long tapered catheter placement method were significantly higher than those for patients treated with conventional method (p = 0.0208 using log-rank test) but were similar to rates for those treated with fixed-catheter-tip method.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Graph shows Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine cumulative patency of hepatic artery according to catheter placement method. {blacktriangleup} = long tapered catheter placement method, censored cases; {circ} = conventional method, censored cases; X = fixed-catheter-tip method, censored cases. Patency rates for patients treated with long tapered catheter placement method were significantly higher than those for patients treated with conventional method (p = 0.0066 using log-rank test) but were not statistically different from those treated with fixed-catheter-tip method.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.