AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Tables
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bhargavan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bhargavan, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

A Portrait of Breast Imaging Specialists and of the Interpretation of Mammography in the United States

Rebecca S. Lewis1, Jonathan H. Sunshine,1,2 and Mythreyi Bhargavan1

1 Research Department, American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Dr., Reston, VA 20191.
2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1 —Number and percentage of radiologists who are breast imaging (BI) specialists, by definition of breast imaging specialist.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2 —Number and percentage of radiologists who do some breast imaging (BI).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3 —Percentage of mammograms interpreted by breast imaging (BI) specialists, by definition of breast imaging specialist.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4 —Percentage of interpreters (gray bars) and percentage of mammograms interpreted (black bars), by volume of interpretations.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5 —Percentage of interpreters (gray bars) and percentage of mammograms interpreted (black bars), by degree of urbanness of location.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6 —Percentage of interpreters (gray bars) and percentage of mammograms interpreted (black bars), by practice type.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.