AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ko, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Slanetz, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ko, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Slanetz, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Prospective Assessment of Computer-Aided Detection in Interpretation of Screening Mammography

Justin M. Ko1, Michael J. Nicholas1,2, Jeffrey B. Mendel1 and Priscilla J. Slanetz1,3

1 Department of Radiology, Caritas St. Elizabeth's Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Hospital of Saint Raphael, New Haven, CT.
3 Present address: Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 88 East Newton St., Boston, MA 02118.


Figure 1
View larger version (91K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1A —49-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Patient presented with palpable mass 5 months after screening mammography. Stage II invasive ductal carcinoma was seen at biopsy. Mediolateral oblique view reveals no suspicious findings.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (78K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1B —49-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Patient presented with palpable mass 5 months after screening mammography. Stage II invasive ductal carcinoma was seen at biopsy. Craniocaudal view shows subtle asymmetry.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1C —49-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Patient presented with palpable mass 5 months after screening mammography. Stage II invasive ductal carcinoma was seen at biopsy. Right craniocaudal view at time of screening mammogram.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (46K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1D —49-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Patient presented with palpable mass 5 months after screening mammography. Stage II invasive ductal carcinoma was seen at biopsy. Right craniocaudal view 4 months later. Asymmetry was not marked by radiologist but was marked by computer-aided detection (CAD) on screening mammogram craniocaudal view. Mass (arrow) was not marked by CAD when patient returned with palpable mass. Linear markers on images are routinely placed on skin over visible incision sites in women who have previously undergone surgery.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (123K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2A —50-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Grade II ductal carcinoma in situ was seen at biopsy. Mediolateral oblique (A) and craniocaudal (B) views show faint calcifications that were marked by computer-aided detection (CAD) on craniocaudal view, as indicated by irregular circle in left breast, outer quadrant, but were not marked by radiologist.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (115K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2B —50-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Grade II ductal carcinoma in situ was seen at biopsy. Mediolateral oblique (A) and craniocaudal (B) views show faint calcifications that were marked by computer-aided detection (CAD) on craniocaudal view, as indicated by irregular circle in left breast, outer quadrant, but were not marked by radiologist.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (102K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2C —50-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Grade II ductal carcinoma in situ was seen at biopsy. Left craniocaudal film shows calcifications more clearly.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (107K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3A —81-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Grade I ductal carcinoma in situ was seen at biopsy. Mediolateral oblique (A) and craniocaudal (B) views show irregular mass that was marked by radiologist (indicated by wax pencil mark) and missed by computer-aided detection (CAD).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (84K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3B —81-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Grade I ductal carcinoma in situ was seen at biopsy. Mediolateral oblique (A) and craniocaudal (B) views show irregular mass that was marked by radiologist (indicated by wax pencil mark) and missed by computer-aided detection (CAD).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (73K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3C —81-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Grade I ductal carcinoma in situ was seen at biopsy. Right craniocaudal (C) and right mediolateral oblique (D) magnified views from original screening examination show this mass (arrow) more clearly.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (50K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3D —81-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Grade I ductal carcinoma in situ was seen at biopsy. Right craniocaudal (C) and right mediolateral oblique (D) magnified views from original screening examination show this mass (arrow) more clearly.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4A —81-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Stage I invasive ductal carcinoma was seen at biopsy. Mediolateral oblique (A) and craniocaudal (B) views show architectural distortion that was marked by radiologist (indicated by wax pencil mark) and missed by computer-aided detection (CAD).

 

Figure 13
View larger version (120K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4B —81-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Stage I invasive ductal carcinoma was seen at biopsy. Mediolateral oblique (A) and craniocaudal (B) views show architectural distortion that was marked by radiologist (indicated by wax pencil mark) and missed by computer-aided detection (CAD).

 

Figure 14
View larger version (116K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4C —81-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Stage I invasive ductal carcinoma was seen at biopsy. Left craniocaudal (C) and left mediolateral oblique (D) magnified views from original screening examination show architectural distortion more clearly. Arrow indicates location of lesion.

 

Figure 15
View larger version (105K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4D —81-year-old woman underwent bilateral screening mammography. Stage I invasive ductal carcinoma was seen at biopsy. Left craniocaudal (C) and left mediolateral oblique (D) magnified views from original screening examination show architectural distortion more clearly. Arrow indicates location of lesion.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.