Comparison of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography for Detection and Characterization of Simulated Small Masses
Wei T. Yang1,
Chao-Jen Lai1,
Gary J. Whitman1,
William A. Murphy, Jr.1,
Mark J. Dryden1,
Anne C. Kushwaha1,
Aysegul A. Sahin1,
Dennis Johnston1,
Peter J. Dempsey1 and
Chris C. Shaw1
1 All authors: Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas M. D.
Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 57, Houston, TX 77030.
Fig. 3AImages of phantom breast masses. Each mammogram has six
randomly assigned detection tasks (circles) consisting of
true-positives (masses of varying sizes, shapes, and densities) and
true-negatives distributed in areas of varying background complexity in the
anthropomorphic phantom. Full-field digital mammography.
Fig. 3BImages of phantom breast masses. Each mammogram has six
randomly assigned detection tasks (circles) consisting of
true-positives (masses of varying sizes, shapes, and densities) and
true-negatives distributed in areas of varying background complexity in the
anthropomorphic phantom. Screen-film mammography.
Fig. 4Receiver operating characteristic curves for full-field
digital mammography (solid line) and screen-film mammography
(dotted line). For full-field digital mammography, area under the
receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.905 ± 0.015. For
screen-film mammography, AUC= 0.879 ± 0.016.