AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F., IV
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Preclinical Medical Student Training in Radiology: The Effect of Early Exposure

Barton F. Branstetter, IV1,2, Laura E. Faix1, Allen L. Humphrey3 and John B. Schumann3

1 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop St., PUH Rm. D132, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
2 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
3 Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
 

Figure 3
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
 

Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
 

Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
 

Figure 6
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 1 —Survey responses on attitude questions for class of 2007 (no formal radiology) and class of 2008 (new curriculum). Differences are statistically significant for every question.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
 

Figure 8
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
 

Figure 9
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
 

Figure 10
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
 

Figure 11
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2 —Survey responses on knowledge questions for class of 2007 (no formal radiology) and class of 2008 (new curriculum). Overall scores are statistically significantly different. Asterisks indicate correct answer.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.