AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mühlenbruch, G.
Right arrow Articles by Koos, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mühlenbruch, G.
Right arrow Articles by Koos, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Evaluation of Aortocoronary Bypass Stents with Cardiac MDCT Compared with Conventional Catheter Angiography

Georg Mühlenbruch1, Andreas H. Mahnken1,2, Marco Das1, Rüdiger Blindt3, Christian Hohl1, Joachim E. Wildberger1, Rolf W. Günther1, Harald P. Kühl3 and Ralf Koos3

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital (RWTH) Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057 Aachen, Germany.
2 Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
3 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital (RWTH) Aachen, 52057 Aachen, Germany.


Figure 1
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —55-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Stent had been placed in middle part of venous right coronary artery bypass graft. Min/Max = minimum and maximum diameters, measured in millimeters. MDCT images show examples for planning individually adapted planes orthogonal to vessel course outside and inside stent.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —55-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Stent had been placed in middle part of venous right coronary artery bypass graft. Min/Max = minimum and maximum diameters, measured in millimeters. MDCT images show examples for planning individually adapted planes orthogonal to vessel course outside and inside stent.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1C —55-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Stent had been placed in middle part of venous right coronary artery bypass graft. Min/Max = minimum and maximum diameters, measured in millimeters. Images illustrate how vessel and stent diameters and attenuation values were determined using MDCT.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1D —55-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Stent had been placed in middle part of venous right coronary artery bypass graft. Min/Max = minimum and maximum diameters, measured in millimeters. Images illustrate how vessel and stent diameters and attenuation values were determined using MDCT.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1E —55-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Stent had been placed in middle part of venous right coronary artery bypass graft. Min/Max = minimum and maximum diameters, measured in millimeters. Images illustrate how vessel and stent diameters and attenuation values were determined using MDCT.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1F —55-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Stent had been placed in middle part of venous right coronary artery bypass graft. Min/Max = minimum and maximum diameters, measured in millimeters. Images illustrate how vessel and stent diameters and attenuation values were determined using MDCT.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —Quantitative measurements of vessel and stent diameters in 74-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Invasive coronary angiography images show measurements corresponding to MDCT (not shown).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —Quantitative measurements of vessel and stent diameters in 74-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Invasive coronary angiography images show measurements corresponding to MDCT (not shown).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2C —Quantitative measurements of vessel and stent diameters in 74-year-old man with coronary artery disease. Invasive coronary angiography images show measurements corresponding to MDCT (not shown).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —Bland-Altman plots of mean vessel diameters, all of which were measured in millimeters. Mean vessel diameters outside (A) and inside (B) stent show level of agreement of conventional angiography and cardiac MDCT angiography. No systematic deviation of data was observed. Solid lines show means, and dashed lines show SDs.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —Bland-Altman plots of mean vessel diameters, all of which were measured in millimeters. Mean vessel diameters outside (A) and inside (B) stent show level of agreement of conventional angiography and cardiac MDCT angiography. No systematic deviation of data was observed. Solid lines show means, and dashed lines show SDs.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 —Graph shows mean diameter measurements of angiography ({blacksquare}) and MDCT ({blacktriangleup}) compared with mechanical diameter ({diamondsuit}) for each stent. In all 20 stents, 51 positions of in-stent measurements were achievable.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5A —61-year-old man after bypass stent placement 4 years earlier who presented with atypical chest pain. MDCT angiography images reveal lumen narrowing in distal part of bypass graft stent (arrows).

 

Figure 14
View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5B —61-year-old man after bypass stent placement 4 years earlier who presented with atypical chest pain. MDCT angiography images reveal lumen narrowing in distal part of bypass graft stent (arrows).

 

Figure 15
View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5C —61-year-old man after bypass stent placement 4 years earlier who presented with atypical chest pain. Lumen narrowing shown in A and B was confirmed as in-stent stenosis (arrows) on conventional angiography. Due to small stent caliber (3 mm), quality of CT images is hampered right before coronary anastomosis of bypass graft.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5D —61-year-old man after bypass stent placement 4 years earlier who presented with atypical chest pain. Lumen narrowing shown in A and B was confirmed as in-stent stenosis (arrows) on conventional angiography. Due to small stent caliber (3 mm), quality of CT images is hampered right before coronary anastomosis of bypass graft.

 

Figure 17
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6A —Bar graphs show image noise and CT attenuation values outside and inside stent. Image noise (A) and CT attenuation (B) values were 1 cm before (pre) and 1 cm after (post), and inside stent. Paired Student's t tests were applied.

 

Figure 18
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6B —Bar graphs show image noise and CT attenuation values outside and inside stent. Image noise (A) and CT attenuation (B) values were 1 cm before (pre) and 1 cm after (post), and inside stent. Paired Student's t tests were applied.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.