AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blachar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Abeid, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blachar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Abeid, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Imaging of Normal Anatomic Features and Postoperative Gastrointestinal Complications

Arye Blachar1,2,3, Annat Blank1,2, Nancy Gavert2,4, Ur Metzer1,2, Gideon Fluser1,2 and Subhi Abu-Abeid2,4

1 Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman St., Tel Aviv 64239, Israel.
2 The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel.
3 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
4 Department of Surgery B, Bariatric Surgery Service, Tel Aviv Soursaky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel.


Figure 1
View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1A —Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding device. Photograph shows adjustable band with inflatable sleeve (black arrow) connected through catheter to subcutaneous port (white arrow).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1B —Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding device. Unenhanced abdominal radiograph shows inflatable sleeve (black arrow) connected through catheter to subcutaneous port (white arrow).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2A —56-year-old woman with normal anatomic findings after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Esophagogram shows contrast material passing through esophagus (E) and stoma into stomach (S). Band (arrow) is properly located.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2B —56-year-old woman with normal anatomic findings after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Axial CT section at level of band (arrow) shows small gastric pouch (GP) and contrast material in stomach.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3A —26-year-old woman with acute stomal stenosis 7 months after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding surgery. Symptom was recurrent vomiting that increased in severity. Esophagogram shows dilated upper pouch (P) and minute passage of contrast material through narrow stoma (arrow).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3B —26-year-old woman with acute stomal stenosis 7 months after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding surgery. Symptom was recurrent vomiting that increased in severity. Esophagogram after band deflation shows normal passage of contrast material (arrow) from esophagus (E) to stomach (S).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4 —32-year-old woman with chronic stomal stenosis with concentric dilatation 1 year after surgery. Symptoms were intermittent vomiting and weight gain. Esophagogram shows markedly dilated pouch (black arrows) containing food debris. Band (white arrow) has migrated inferiorly and is located just below diaphragm.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 5 —57-year-old woman with severe chronic stomal stenosis necessitating band removal, after which symptoms eventually resolved. Esophagogram shows markedly dilated and tortuous sigmoid esophagus (E) with no passage of contrast material through slightly malpositioned band (arrow).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 6 —50-year-old woman with heartburn and difficulty swallowing. Gastroscopy revealed presence of meat and dried fruit residue. Esophagogram shows constant filling defect (black arrow) in distal esophagus (E) just above band with normal passage of contrast material (white arrow) to stomach (S).

 

Figure 10
View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 7 —65-year-old man with filling defect due to tumor. Symptom was weight gain; no obstructive symptoms occurred. Biopsy at gastroscopy showed metastasis of malignant melanoma. Esophagogram shows large filling defect (thin white arrow) in distal esophagus (E). Irregularity of esophageal wall (thick arrow) and normal passage of contrast material through band (black arrow) into stomach (S) are evident.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8A —42-year-old woman with posterior band slippage 8 months after surgery. Symptoms were recurrent vomiting, abdominal pain, regurgitation, and chronic cough due to recurrent aspiration. Esophagogram shows posterior slippage of proximal pouch (P) inferior in relation to vertically malpositioned band (arrow). E = esophagus.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 8B —42-year-old woman with posterior band slippage 8 months after surgery. Symptoms were recurrent vomiting, abdominal pain, regurgitation, and chronic cough due to recurrent aspiration. Coronal multiplanar CT reconstruction shows band (arrow) has slipped from its normal position immediately below gastroesophageal junction. Gastric pouch (GP) is larger than expected. S = stomach.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 9 —50-year-old woman with anterior band slippage with recurrent vomiting and upper abdominal discomfort. Esophagogram shows proximal pouch (P) is superior in relation to inferiorly positioned band (arrow). E = esophagus.

 

Figure 14
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 10 —40-year-old woman with band slippage, persistent vomiting due to posterior band slippage, and surgically proven gastric volvulus. Barium esophagogram shows lateral position of band (thick arrow) with inferior dilated pouch (P) consistent with posterior slippage. Distal part of stomach (S) is above band, and because of gastric volvulus, greater curvature (thin arrow) is superior in relation to lesser curvature.

 

Figure 15
View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11A —51-year-old man with band perforation and peritonitis 2 weeks after surgery. Symptoms were fever and abdominal pain. Axial CT scan shows extraluminal air (thin arrow) adjacent to band (white thick arrow) and proximal stomach. Free perisplenic air and fluid (black thick arrow) are evident.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 11B —51-year-old man with band perforation and peritonitis 2 weeks after surgery. Symptoms were fever and abdominal pain. Esophagogram shows free air (thin arrows) surrounding band and catheter. Extraluminal contrast material (thick arrow) around band and passage of contrast medium through band from esophagus (E) into stomach (S) are evident.

 

Figure 17
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12A —46-year-old man with large left subphrenic abscess managed with CT-guided abdominal abscess drainage. Axial CT scan at level of gastric band (arrow) shows large perisplenic fluid collection (C). S = stomach, SP = spleen.

 

Figure 18
View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 12B —46-year-old man with large left subphrenic abscess managed with CT-guided abdominal abscess drainage. Axial CT scan at same level as A after successful drainage of abscess. Pigtail catheter (thin arrow) in remaining fluid collection and intraperitoneal portion of catheter (thick arrow) are evident. S = stomach, SP = spleen.

 

Figure 19
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 13 —47-year-old woman with band erosion and sustained weight gain 2 years after surgery. Esophagogram shows contrast material (arrow) passing around band instead of through it, suggesting intragastric band location. E = esophagus.

 

Figure 20
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 14 —21-year-old man with port disconnection. Symptom was recent weight gain after maintenance of 30-kg weight loss since surgery. Radiograph of abdomen shows port end of catheter (thin arrow) disconnected from catheter (thick arrow).

 

Figure 21
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 15 —27-year-old woman with catheter leakage 5 weeks after surgery. Radiograph obtained after injection of contrast material through port (thick arrow) shows leakage of contrast material from catheter into peritoneal cavity (thin arrows).

 

Figure 22
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 16 —40-year-old man with band leakage 6 months after surgery. Symptom was weight gain despite previous inflation of cuff. Fluoroscopic image with contrast material injected through port shows extravasation of contrast material from band (thick arrow). Contrast material (thin arrows) is evident in peritoneal cavity.

 

Figure 23
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 17 —38-year-old woman with "aneurysm" of band 1 year after surgery. Symptom was nonspecific upper abdominal discomfort developing over previous 3 months and more apparent after eating. Radiograph obtained after injection of contrast material through port (black thick arrow) shows uneven inflation of sleeve inside band (white thick arrow) resembling aneurysmal dilatation due to technical failure. Clips (thin arrow) from cholecystectomy are evident.

 

Figure 24
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 18 —45-year-old woman with port infection. Symptom was pain in port area. Port puncture yielded turbid fluid drawn from port-catheter system. Axial CT scan shows fluid and infiltration of subcutaneous fat surrounding port (thin arrows) and catheter (thick arrow).

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.