AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Craig, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Craig, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

Comparative Accuracy of Renal Duplex Sonographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Renal Artery Stenosis: Paired and Unpaired Analysis

Gabrielle J. Williams1,2, Petra Macaskill2, Siew F. Chan2, Thomas E. Karplus3, Winkle Yung3, Elisabeth M. Hodson1 and Jonathan C. Craig1,2

1 Centre for Kidney Research and Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Hawkesbury Rd. (Locked Bag 4001) Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia.
2 Screening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
3 Department of Vascular Medicine, Concord Hospital, Concord, Sydney, Australia.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 1 —Flow chart of identified and included studies.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2A —Summary receiver operator characteristics curves. DOR = diagnostic odds ratio, RDOR = relative DOR. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), renal-aortic ratio (RAR), acceleration time (AT), and acceleration index (AI).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2B —Summary receiver operator characteristics curves. DOR = diagnostic odds ratio, RDOR = relative DOR. Studies in which both PSV and RAR were examined separately.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2C —Summary receiver operator characteristics curves. DOR = diagnostic odds ratio, RDOR = relative DOR. Studies in which AI and AT were examined separately.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2D —Summary receiver operator characteristics curves. DOR = diagnostic odds ratio, RDOR = relative DOR. Studies in which PSV was examined alone and in combination with other parameters.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
  		Fig. 2E —Summary receiver operator characteristics curves. DOR = diagnostic odds ratio, RDOR = relative DOR. Studies in which PSV and AI were examined separately.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.