AJR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlosser, T.
Right arrow Articles by Barkhausen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlosser, T.
Right arrow Articles by Barkhausen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Influence of Reconstruction Interval and Reconstruction Increment Using 64-MDCT

Thomas Schlosser1,2, Peter Hunold1, Thomas Voigtländer2, Axel Schmermund2 and Jörg Barkhausen1

1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45122, Germany.
2 Cardiovascular Center Bethanien, Frankfurt 60389, Germany.


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1 —Slight but significant negative correlation was found between the total Agatston score and coefficient of variation in all patients (R =-0.55; p <0.01).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2 —Transverse CT scans in 63-year-old man. Upper row shows CT images (collimation, 0.6 mm; slice thickness, 3 mm; reconstruction increment, 3 mm) of same slice position at different reconstruction intervals, from 50% on left to 70% on right, of the R-R interval in 5% steps. Lower row shows CT images of consecutive slice position at same reconstruction intervals. Two calcified plaques located in proximal left anterior descending artery are clearly detectable using 60%, 65%, and 70% reconstruction intervals, resulting in total Agatston score of 53, 50, and 50, respectively. Mild smearing artifacts are seen in 55% reconstruction (total Agatston score, 42), whereas 50% reconstruction results in a distinct underestimation of Agatston score (19) due to severe smearing artifacts.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3 —Transverse CT scans in 81-year-old man. Upper row shows CT images (collimation, 0.6 mm; slice thickness, 3 mm; reconstruction increment, 3 mm) of same slice position at different reconstruction intervals, from 50% on left to 70% on right, of the R-R interval in 5% steps. Lower row displays same CT images; calcified plaques are marked in red. Two calcified plaques located in left mainstem and proximal left anterior descending arteries are clearly visualized using 50%, 55%, 60%, and 65% reconstruction intervals, resulting in total Agatston score of 78, 87, 81, and 88, respectively. In 70% reconstruction interval, calcium is deformed and blurred, resulting in overestimation of total Agatston score of 122.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4A —Graphs of volumetric scores. Graphs show individual volumetric scores of all patients of group A (A) and group B (B) at reconstruction increments of 1.5 and 3.0 mm.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4B —Graphs of volumetric scores. Graphs show individual volumetric scores of all patients of group A (A) and group B (B) at reconstruction increments of 1.5 and 3.0 mm.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.